Folks, did you know that squooshy thing at your midriff we cover up with oversized blouses and untucked shirts is just plain, simple old white fat. Well, you probably did, but for you Oakland Raiders fans (hey, I’m in Denver!!), it’s scientifically called white adipose tissue (WAT) and it stores surplus energy.
Over the last several decades, we have gotten really good at storing LOTS of surplus energy. CDC says 65% of us Americans are overweight, almost 25% of us are seriously obese. And it appears we’ve exported this characteristic. A Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation study published in the Lancet has revealed that 40% of the global population is overweight or obese. Yuck! Bad stat. Good stat for the Raiders interior offensive line, however.
I just learned that there is a different colored fat – brown. Aren’t we all glad our squishy middles don’t show up brown? This brown fat is called BAT, brown adipose tissue (brilliant!). It burns energy and generates heat.
White adipose makes up most of our fat, especially as we age. And that’s not a good thing. Especially when it accumulates, creeps over your beltline, alters your wardrobe and makes shoe tying an aerobic experience.
Oh, did I mention that it’s also killing us slowly? More on that further down. Keep reading.
Science to the rescue
Well, fret not. Science once again seems to be on the trail of a quick-fix. A no-sweat, no-effort, keep-your-Lazyboy solution. It’s only proven out on little white furry creatures so far, but it’s looking like they may be able to develop yet another receptor blocker. This one magically increases the conversion of WAT to BAT.
There you go – stored energy to burned energy. Sounds simple enough. The payoff: reduction in obesity and improved sensitivity to insulin.
You can read about this research here.
You can also read about WAT vs BAT here.
Craig’s List and eBay are gonna get hammered!
I can see it now. This magic potion hits the market and you will be able to negotiate incredible prices for used treadmills, upright bikes, ellipticals, Bowflexes, etc. on Craig’s List and eBay. Most of these, fortunately, will have lots of life left because most of them will not have been used much in the first place.
Many basements will be creating much needed new storage space.
When this pill is announced, I’m selling my Lifetime Fitness stock and moving the money over to Lazyboy, Burger King, and Netflix.
Can we get real here?
Have I plastered enough sarcasm into this diatribe yet?
I guess I should be grateful that we have the money and the brains to be working on all these marvelous remedies for self-inflicted maladies.
But, if we honestly peer deeper into this accumulated adipose, we have to admit that most of the accumulation is due to a crappy lifestyle. Don’t we know all that we need to know to prevent WAT accumulation without a pill – or a scalpel? Haven’t we known it practically forever?
Well yeah!! It’s called exercise – and sensible nutrition.
Let’s pass some legislation
No, I didn’t really mean that. To turn to Comedy Central on the Potomac for anything promoting healthy, non-pharma lifestyle would be like expecting Kim Jong-un to start a nationwide bible-study initiative.
We can’t legislate a mindset. And mindsets and beliefs guide our lives. Tony Robbins has transformed millions of lives by emphasizing the importance of evaluating and questioning our beliefs.
Is it a stretch to say that a 50” male midriff or a 40” female midriff is a product of a belief or mindset? Perhaps. It may be a belief that “it comes with my genetics or my body-type or it’s what happens as we get older.” But we’ve known for a long time that none of those are the real truth. We do know that the condition is correctable in nearly every case.
I posit that the 50”/40” condition is more a product of naivete or the biggest killer on our planet – healthcare illiteracy – mixed in with laziness, instant gratification, comfort-seeking.
Become a student of metabolic syndrome
I’m not qualified to dispense medical advice, nor is it my intent. But what I want to share is information on what we know that is harming us. WAT and bulging waistlines is a biggie (sorry, pun intended). We’ve known that for a long time.
Waistline size from adipose white fat collection is killing us slowly and is one of the key components of metabolic syndrome which Mayo Clinic describes as follows:
“ – a cluster of conditions — increased blood pressure, high blood sugar, excess body fat around the waist, and abnormal cholesterol or triglyceride levels — that occur together, increasing your risk of heart disease, stroke, and diabetes.
Having just one of these conditions doesn’t mean you have metabolic syndrome. However, any of these conditions increase your risk of serious disease. Having more than one of these might increase your risk even more.”
Enough rant! Solution, please.
The medical literature is pretty clear on waistline size and the need for WAT reduction:
- Men: ideal waist size: under 36 inches. Above 40” is high risk. Note: the measurement is at the navel. It’s not your pant size. Pant size will typically run 2-4 inches less than your actual waist size.
- Women: ideal waist size: under 32 inches. Above 35”is high risk. Same measurement method applies.
Getting there? Please, don’t wait for the aforementioned pill. Three steps will kickstart the WAT to BAT conversion:
- Give up your Lazyboy to your golden retriever. Take the batteries out of the remote.
- Dust off the bike/elliptical/treadmill or renew your gym membership and find 30 minutes a day for at least five days a week to get your heart rate into your exercise range (220 minus your age times .85 and .65). If you’ve been glued to your now relinquished Lazyboy for a long time, work your way up to that to avoid injury.
- Fat begets fat so ditch the meat. OK, that’s tough in our culture but you can wean your way off. Think this way. If your source of protein walked or flew at some point before you ate it, some of it’s going to your belt line. If it stood on one leg most of its life (OK – let me help you Oakland Raider fans here – plants), it’s not converting to adipose.
That’s pretty simple, don’t you think? Certainly, not very original on my part. This mantra has been out since like forever. But big pharma, big food, and the meat industry prefer you forget or ignore it.
At your peril!
Personally, I can’t stand to have an untucked t-shirt touch my adipose. That’s my signal that my waistline has started to creep back up and it’s time to ditch the snack foods and get the heart rate a little higher a little longer.
At age 75 and at 5’ 11”, I’m holding steady at a 36″ waistline. Easy? Nope! Fact is, WAT accumulates faster and is harder to get rid of as we age. Put that together with gravity and you have a significant challenge to hit the healthy numbers. For me, it takes a commitment to 45 minutes of aerobic exercise six days a week supplemented with three days of aggressive strength training a week to maintain. I marry that regimen to a “flexitarian” diet of mostly plants in which “meat is a treat” that we experience maybe once or twice a month. I confess that the one thing I won’t give up, but should, is my one early-evening micro-brew before dinner.
We know all we need to know
I’ll wrap with a repeat of a quote by Dr. David Katz, a physician at the Yale School of Medicine, and founder of an organization called the Academy of Lifestyle Medicine. I heard him say the following in a presentation to a large group of his peers:
“We already know all that we need to know to reduce, by 80%, the five major killers in our country. We don’t need any more fancy drugs or equipment or more Nobel Prizes. We know all we need to know today.”
Maybe I should send that quote to the research team working on the brown-fat pill.
Nah! Let them have their fun.
What’s your solution for converting white to brown? Scroll down and leave your thoughts on this issue. What are your thoughts on the state of our healthcare literacy in this country?
Oh, and by the way, if you haven’t subscribed to our weekly newsletter, go to www.makeagingwork.com and sign up. We’ll shoot you a free ebook on living longer, healthier and more productively.
Have You Started Your Second-half Reinvention Yet?
The January-February 2018 issue of the AARP Bulletin included a nine-page article entitled “Great Second Careers” Sub-title: “Good news: You CAN Find Success, Security and Happiness After 50 With a New Job.”
Not totally boring. Kind of a band-wagon article. An eclectic collection of stories of people who made late-life pivots to jobs or businesses earning themselves from $0 to $250K per year.
I love how AARP has changed its tune. It’s like the tiger has changed its stripes.
You remember them, don’t you? Used to be the American Association of Retired Persons, the highly-profitable, “non-profit” insurance seller disguised as a crusader/advocate for the retired and the “elderly-in-training.”
Now it’s just AARP. An acronym with no words behind it.
You have to hand it to them. They were smart enough to get off a slowing train and get on a faster moving one, wisely repackaging/rebranding/retreating to a more appropriate moniker. Got that word retirement out of the name – and changed their tune. They don’t talk retirement so much anymore. In fact, not one article in the aforementioned 56-page bulletin about retirement.
Could there be a much stronger statement to the evolving nature of traditional retirement? As in, going away.
DISCLAIMER
Please know that I don’t have an AARP membership nor do I subscribe to the Bulletin – nor will I ever. It was sent to me by a friend who knows of my passion for “pivoting” people’s view of retirement.
In fact, I’ve never liked AARP since they started invading my mailbox, a quarter-century ago, with promo materials six hours before my 50th birthday, hinting strongly that I was now over the hill, fast approaching senior status and deserving of discounts on restaurants and travel destinations where other elders-in-training hung out.
Didn’t sound like fun at the time – still doesn’t.
But, despite my disdain for the organization, I applaud the nature of the article because it draws attention to the growing awareness that work promotes vitality, that creative energy doesn’t die with age, and that over-50 is far from over-the-hill.
Oh, and without saying it, that traditional retirement kinda sucks.
It’s a collection of tales of personal reinvention.
Have you started your reinvention yet?
Reinvention is a hot word these days, especially in business circles. It seems if a company isn’t reinventing, it will soon be toast, like a Blockbuster or a Borders or Kodak or a Blackberry. Who’s next? Macy’s? GE? Healthcare giants? It’s likely to be a bloody trail of business bodies over the next ten years.
But what about us mere mortals? Do we run the same risk? What happens if reinvention isn’t part of our short- or long-term perspective? Is there a chance that we can be similarly Netflixed, Amazoned or I-phoned?
From my perspective, it’s a pretty easy yes to that question. The recruiting business immerses one in lots of transition stories. I meet people who are aware of, accepting of, and acting on the fact that the pace of change has never been faster or more profound than what we are experiencing today. They are sensing the need to reinvent, augment, pivot or re-career to stay ahead of, or up with, the change curve.
Unfortunately, I meet far more who are late to the party. As in having the rug pulled out from under them and not seeing it coming. Or pro-actively leaving a dead-end job only to find that they are ill-equipped to re-enter at another point.
What worked five years ago doesn’t work today.
What is reinvention anyway?
I’ll borrow a few thoughts and mix in a few of my own as to what “reinvention” means for someone moving into the second half of life.
If you follow James Altucher (NOTE: proceed with caution if you start following him – he is a wonderfully strange, esoteric, transparent dude!), you know that he has a best-seller entitled “Reinvent Yourself”. This is a guy who tries to reinvent himself every day.
That would be a stretch for those of us who are new to the idea but here’s his view of reinvention, from a guy who has reinvented himself in major ways 15-20 times in his 50 years. To Altucher, reinvention is:
It’s an old story now that long-standing, traditional white- and blue-collar jobs are succumbing in droves to globalization and the impact of digitization. With that comes sob story after sob story from those caught in this transformation.
I don’t see any signs of this pace and magnitude of change abating. In fact, with advancing technologies like artificial intelligence, robotics, genomic testing, 3-D printing, nano-technology to name just a few, all signs point to this transformation continuing at an accelerating pace.
Finding your essence
If you are an AARP fan and have read the article, you will have detected a common theme running through nearly all the stories – the pursuit of a dream or a passion. All of these “second-careerers” reinvented themselves by regathering their skills and experiences and stirring them into that passion to achieve a dream. And they plugged that dream into a need in the marketplace.
I liken it to a rediscovery of the “essential self”, more or less a resurrecting of that 6-year old in each of them that had been tamped down with 30 years or so of cultural social expectations.
A favorite quote that I repeat every morning speaks to transformation by identifying your essential self. It comes from Martha Beck’s fantastic book “Finding Your Own Northstar, Claiming the Life You Were Meant to Live.”
“Freed from rigid social expectations, focused firmly on your essential self, you stop conforming to any of the pre-designated patterns of your cultural environment. Instead, you turn your life into a work of art, an absolutely original expression of your unique gifts and preferences.”
Each of our lives can be a work of art. My sense is that most of the folks in the AARP article are heeding the call of their essential self, scaping off the social barnacles, stepping out, taking some risks and striving to make their lives their own work of art.
We all have access to all the riches of the universe to do the same. None of that changes because we hit a certain number.
Please don’t stop learning
I had a conversation recently with a C-level healthcare executive who had just worked his way out of a consulting job after successfully transforming the operations of a large mid-western healthcare system. In his late-50’s, he has a fearless excitement about what his next challenge will be as he puts himself out there for another position.
It was obvious from our conversation that this successful exec “gets it” when it comes to staying ahead of the curve of developments in his area of focus. I asked him what advice he would have for anyone making a mid-life or later career transition. He answered without hesitation:
Sage advice from a guy who knows what he wants to do and where he wants to go and has learned how to maximize his chances of getting there through continuous learning and reinvention. After hearing him talk, I have little doubt he will have lots of attractive options presented to him.
That’s what it takes today. To not reinvent is perilous.
I’d love to hear your reinvention story. Scroll down and tell me what you’ve done, why you did it and how you did it. Or email me at gary@makeagingwork.com. Share your story and so we can share it with our readers.
Yippee! Soon, a pill to replace your treadmill!
Folks, did you know that squooshy thing at your midriff we cover up with oversized blouses and untucked shirts is just plain, simple old white fat. Well, you probably did, but for you Oakland Raiders fans (hey, I’m in Denver!!), it’s scientifically called white adipose tissue (WAT) and it stores surplus energy.
Over the last several decades, we have gotten really good at storing LOTS of surplus energy. CDC says 65% of us Americans are overweight, almost 25% of us are seriously obese. And it appears we’ve exported this characteristic. A Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation study published in the Lancet has revealed that 40% of the global population is overweight or obese. Yuck! Bad stat. Good stat for the Raiders interior offensive line, however.
I just learned that there is a different colored fat – brown. Aren’t we all glad our squishy middles don’t show up brown? This brown fat is called BAT, brown adipose tissue (brilliant!). It burns energy and generates heat.
White adipose makes up most of our fat, especially as we age. And that’s not a good thing. Especially when it accumulates, creeps over your beltline, alters your wardrobe and makes shoe tying an aerobic experience.
Oh, did I mention that it’s also killing us slowly? More on that further down. Keep reading.
Science to the rescue
Well, fret not. Science once again seems to be on the trail of a quick-fix. A no-sweat, no-effort, keep-your-Lazyboy solution. It’s only proven out on little white furry creatures so far, but it’s looking like they may be able to develop yet another receptor blocker. This one magically increases the conversion of WAT to BAT.
There you go – stored energy to burned energy. Sounds simple enough. The payoff: reduction in obesity and improved sensitivity to insulin.
You can read about this research here.
You can also read about WAT vs BAT here.
Craig’s List and eBay are gonna get hammered!
I can see it now. This magic potion hits the market and you will be able to negotiate incredible prices for used treadmills, upright bikes, ellipticals, Bowflexes, etc. on Craig’s List and eBay. Most of these, fortunately, will have lots of life left because most of them will not have been used much in the first place.
Many basements will be creating much needed new storage space.
When this pill is announced, I’m selling my Lifetime Fitness stock and moving the money over to Lazyboy, Burger King, and Netflix.
Can we get real here?
Have I plastered enough sarcasm into this diatribe yet?
I guess I should be grateful that we have the money and the brains to be working on all these marvelous remedies for self-inflicted maladies.
But, if we honestly peer deeper into this accumulated adipose, we have to admit that most of the accumulation is due to a crappy lifestyle. Don’t we know all that we need to know to prevent WAT accumulation without a pill – or a scalpel? Haven’t we known it practically forever?
Well yeah!! It’s called exercise – and sensible nutrition.
Let’s pass some legislation
No, I didn’t really mean that. To turn to Comedy Central on the Potomac for anything promoting healthy, non-pharma lifestyle would be like expecting Kim Jong-un to start a nationwide bible-study initiative.
We can’t legislate a mindset. And mindsets and beliefs guide our lives. Tony Robbins has transformed millions of lives by emphasizing the importance of evaluating and questioning our beliefs.
Is it a stretch to say that a 50” male midriff or a 40” female midriff is a product of a belief or mindset? Perhaps. It may be a belief that “it comes with my genetics or my body-type or it’s what happens as we get older.” But we’ve known for a long time that none of those are the real truth. We do know that the condition is correctable in nearly every case.
I posit that the 50”/40” condition is more a product of naivete or the biggest killer on our planet – healthcare illiteracy – mixed in with laziness, instant gratification, comfort-seeking.
Become a student of metabolic syndrome
I’m not qualified to dispense medical advice, nor is it my intent. But what I want to share is information on what we know that is harming us. WAT and bulging waistlines is a biggie (sorry, pun intended). We’ve known that for a long time.
Waistline size from adipose white fat collection is killing us slowly and is one of the key components of metabolic syndrome which Mayo Clinic describes as follows:
“ – a cluster of conditions — increased blood pressure, high blood sugar, excess body fat around the waist, and abnormal cholesterol or triglyceride levels — that occur together, increasing your risk of heart disease, stroke, and diabetes.
Having just one of these conditions doesn’t mean you have metabolic syndrome. However, any of these conditions increase your risk of serious disease. Having more than one of these might increase your risk even more.”
Enough rant! Solution, please.
The medical literature is pretty clear on waistline size and the need for WAT reduction:
Getting there? Please, don’t wait for the aforementioned pill. Three steps will kickstart the WAT to BAT conversion:
That’s pretty simple, don’t you think? Certainly, not very original on my part. This mantra has been out since like forever. But big pharma, big food, and the meat industry prefer you forget or ignore it.
At your peril!
Personally, I can’t stand to have an untucked t-shirt touch my adipose. That’s my signal that my waistline has started to creep back up and it’s time to ditch the snack foods and get the heart rate a little higher a little longer.
At age 75 and at 5’ 11”, I’m holding steady at a 36″ waistline. Easy? Nope! Fact is, WAT accumulates faster and is harder to get rid of as we age. Put that together with gravity and you have a significant challenge to hit the healthy numbers. For me, it takes a commitment to 45 minutes of aerobic exercise six days a week supplemented with three days of aggressive strength training a week to maintain. I marry that regimen to a “flexitarian” diet of mostly plants in which “meat is a treat” that we experience maybe once or twice a month. I confess that the one thing I won’t give up, but should, is my one early-evening micro-brew before dinner.
We know all we need to know
I’ll wrap with a repeat of a quote by Dr. David Katz, a physician at the Yale School of Medicine, and founder of an organization called the Academy of Lifestyle Medicine. I heard him say the following in a presentation to a large group of his peers:
“We already know all that we need to know to reduce, by 80%, the five major killers in our country. We don’t need any more fancy drugs or equipment or more Nobel Prizes. We know all we need to know today.”
Maybe I should send that quote to the research team working on the brown-fat pill.
Nah! Let them have their fun.
What’s your solution for converting white to brown? Scroll down and leave your thoughts on this issue. What are your thoughts on the state of our healthcare literacy in this country?
Oh, and by the way, if you haven’t subscribed to our weekly newsletter, go to www.makeagingwork.com and sign up. We’ll shoot you a free ebook on living longer, healthier and more productively.
The “$400 Trillion Time Bomb” and “An Unnatural Act”
Quartz, the digital global business news publication, recently published an article entitled “The world is sitting on a $400 trillion financial time bomb.”
Solid fear-inducing stuff, this reporting. Globally, we are going to be short on retirement savings by a mere $400 trillion (with a “t”) by 2050. $137 trillion in the U.S. alone – once again we lead in a dubiously distinctive category.
And it’s all because of an unnatural act.
The unnatural act is the “R” word that pervades our psyche like no other – retirement.
From the moment we start our first job – and often even before – retirement becomes a subtle, silent partner in our thinking and many of the decisions we make. As we move through our 40’s, 50’s, 60’s it takes a progressively larger share of our mental bandwidth and decisions, with anxiety over a false premise at the core – a concept based on an arbitrary, unnatural, artificial, politically-inspired finish line.
Were we really meant to do this?
I’m sorry, but I just have difficulty getting my head around the idea of a creator/universe that would equip us with all the chops and opportunities to wind ourselves up and then not be miffed when we decide to wind it all down and throw it all away based on an irrelevant number.
Do we really have a reasonable rationale for its existence in the form to which it has evolved – that is, vocation-to-vacation, off-the-cliff from work to leisure. And at an age, determined by politicians, that has no relevance today because we are living longer and had even less relevance when established.
The average life expectancy was around 58 when the magic number of 65 was set. As some have pointed out, it set the stage for the greatest Ponzi scheme ever.
Can we agree that retirement, as we’ve come to define it over the last 100 years, is an unnatural act? Where do we see it in nature? We don’t see it in the animal world. We didn’t see it in the human world either until the concept of “social security system” emerged in the late 1800’s when Chancellor Otto von Bismarck injected a version of it into the German economy, primarily to stave off a threat from Marxism.
Not to be outdone, we Americans took the idea, over the course of the 20th century, to the sublime and entrenched the idea of leisurely final chapters so deeply in our psyche that it drives many of our major life decisions – many of which end up being harmful.
Disagree with me? Check the collective cortisol level in this country when the stock market slides 5 or 10%.
Yet, in the face of damning statistics of shortened lifespans, we push forward with fury, fervor, and fantasy in the pursuit of that nirvanic leap into leisurely bliss. Then, once achieved, we discover too late that our biology doesn’t hold up well when unchallenged physically and mentally. And anxiety levels increase as we fret over outliving our money.
I often wonder what our world today would be like if Michelangelo, Socrates, Newton, Einstein (pick your own intellectual, pioneering hero) would have had a 401K/403B to distract them.
Five stages of retirement – proceed with caution.
Ken Dychtwald, the founder of AgeWave, is the foremost thought leader on issues related to aging. His organization has done extensive research on retirement, using a database of over 50,000 retirees. They concluded that retirement has five stages:
Click this link to see Ken’s talk at the American Society on Aging Conference in 2013 for a more detailed presentation of the research starting at minute 26:00 of the video.
I’ll bet you know someone in stage 4 or even stage 5. Hopefully, you see this in time to avoid either.
Don’t be in a rush to give your parts back
I love the quote from one of my favorite virtual mentors, Dan Sullivan of Strategic Coach. In my 12/18/17 blog, I referred to comments he made on retirement in one of his “Exponential Wisdom” podcasts with Peter Diamandis. In addition to referring to retirement as the “ultimate casualty”, he also emphasized that “stopping and retirement means you are ready to retire your bits back to the universe.”
I’m in no hurry – are you?
Suggestion: Don’t participate. Don’t retire
To quote the article:
“Financial disaster is looming, and not because of the stock market or subprime loans. The coming crisis is more insidious, structural, and almost certain to blow up eventually.” (my underline)
So now we’ve got a $400 trillion dollar impending apocalypse to layer onto our worries about N. Korea, climate change, ISIS, nuclear threat, Trump, #metoo, etc., etc.
It’s becoming quite a “chicken little” world. CNN is salivating.
But, participation is optional.
There’s much “gnashing of teeth and ripping of robes” about how we avoid this latest disaster. But no one, interestingly, suggests not retiring. Imagine that! Rather it’s all about extending retirement ages/finish lines, increases in taxes or cuts in benefits.
The retirement mindset really does seem to own us.
Call me idealistic; call me arrogant; call me pollyannish; call me what you like (and I know some will) but I’m not going to participate in this prediction of our eventual demise. I could lie and base my non-participation by claiming to have all the retirement savings I need to avoid being blown up. Truth is, I don’t – it’s not a number I think about because I jettisoned the idea of retirement a decade-and-a-half ago. I’m going to work until I can’t and am confident the money will be there to support my lifestyle business. I sense more and more others are opting out as well.
Have you looked up the word?
Do you agree that creative marketing and opportunistic financial services and leisure industry, uncontested by a greedy political system, have created the illusion of turning something that means “retreat” or “withdraw” or “to disappear” into a positive, dreamy even? Marketing so effective that we now believe that going backward is a positive movement.
Isn’t there something fundamentally wrong – and unnatural -about that?
Perhaps I’m a voice in the wilderness, but I don’t think so. What are your thoughts? Scroll down and leave a comment (or salvo, as the case may be!)
On How To Become an “Audacious Ager”
I have a new favorite term for what I’m striving to be – an “audacious ager”.
Aging is a pretty hot topic because so many of us are experiencing the unstoppable nature of it. It seems we’re on a constant search for things to describe our denial of the eventuality. Things like “purposeful aging”, “successful aging”, “graceful aging”. Creativity abounds amongst us later-lifers in our attempt to put monikers on what we are experiencing.
Margaret Manning at Sixtyandme.com polled 43,000 women and asked them to give her one adverb that described how they were aging. You can see 40 of them in this article.
No grace in aging
Pretty creative and surprising list. Note that no one chose “graceful.” No surprise. There’s not much that’s graceful about it.
Number 40 – “outrageously” – came closest to my new favorite.
My new favorite came from a rather unusual source – the National Business Group on Health’s (NBGH) Business Health Agenda (BHA) conference. NBGHBHA for short – really? This conference apparently focused on employer-sponsored health care plans and the challenges and changes companies are facing in terms of plan design, health data, demographics and much more.
One of the topics presented had to do with the boomer’s role in the future. It emphasized that employers are facing a major paradigm shift for which they are unprepared. An employer poll revealed that, of five predictions for the future, “audacious aging” was the paradigm shift that employers were least prepared to deal with.
Here’s a graph showing the results.
It’s a revealing reflection of the fact that retirement, as we’ve known it, is going away.
It takes guts to age naturally
There are two reasons that “audacious aging” resonated with me. First, I’m a contrarian by nature and being audacious in a number of areas of my life is becoming more common and more comfortable as I’ve outgrown my need to compare and seek the approval of others. It just takes too much frigging mental energy to do either. NOTE: You’ll get there if you aren’t already.
Secondly, I’m learning that to age normally and naturally, we have to be audaciously aggressive against a lot of forces that are pulling us up short of our full life potential.
So maybe you’d like to join me and the growing ranks of audacious agers. If interested, here are some fundamental steps to becoming one:
Be prepared for the ridicule
Let’s face it, the reality is that most people won’t buy into this concept and you are setting yourself up for some not-so-subtle jabs, especially from your inner circle (ref #5 above). They are likely locked into belief systems that say that sedentary retirement is an entitled gift, senescence is automatic, and that aging is more about fate and genetics than choices. But as an audacious ager, you know it’s bull****. You become the model of what is possible and, as Gandhi taught, “be the change you want to see in other people.” Some will want what you’ve got. That’s the biggest payoff of being an audacious ager – effecting change through example.
Maybe you are already an audacious ager. I’d love to hear your story. Leave a comment below or email me at gary@makeagingwork.com and set up a time to talk. I’m on the lookout for audacious agers with big stories to feature on my podcast platform which I will be introducing in early 2018.
While you are at it, click on this link, scroll down and take advantage of my new free ebook, “Achieve Your Full-Life Potential: Five Easy Steps to Living Longer, Healthier, and With More Purpose”.
Wishing you the best
No blog this week. Just my best wishes to you for the holiday season and for 2018 to be the most exciting year of your life!
Thanks for being a subscriber!
www.makeagingwork.com
Work Yourself to Death? Not a Bad Idea!
George Burns was guilty of some really fabulous quotes, most of them quite funny, some deadly serious. Many had to do with his advancing age (he died in 1996 at age 100). Here are a few:
Michelangelo died at 89 – at a time when the average lifespan was less than half that – still working as the architect for the replacement of a 4th-century Constantinian basilica that became St. Peter’s Basilica, called by some as the “greatest creation of the Renaissance.” He also worked on a sculpture (the Rondani Peita) up until six days before his death.
Steve Jobs was widely reported to have died yelling about something not being exactly perfectly correct – and is reported to have been working until the last day.
Einstein never stopped.
Revisiting vocāre
Today we treat folks who choose to “work themselves until death” as some sort of wunderkinds or anomalies when a mere 150 years ago that was the norm. That was before the Industrial Revolution changed the landscape of work and injected the concept of the artificial finish line called retirement.
In the process, it seems we’ve redefined, convoluted and distorted an important word. That word is vocation.
Vocation is rooted in the Latin vocāre, meaning to call, which suggests listening for something that calls out to you, a voice telling me what I am.
Today, we relate vocation to specialized training into a “career track” or a “job” via a vocational or trade school versus a “profession” calling for a bachelor degree or higher. Not likely a pursuit of a “higher calling” but more a decision based on need and what may be trending in the “job” market.
Grammarist.com defines a vocation as “a calling, an occupation, or a large undertaking for which one is especially suited. It can be roughly synonymous with career or profession, though vocation connotes a seriousness or a commitment that these words don’t always bear.”
Today, we tend to mix vocation in with two other words – career and job – when their distinctions are quite different.
Career
A quick look at the definition of “career” shows a big difference. Career has its origin in the Latin word “carrus” or “wheeled vehicle” denoting a “cart” and then later from the French word “carrier” denoting a road or racecourse. The dictionary defines career, as a verb, to mean “move swiftly and in an uncontrolled way in a specified direction.”
Careers for many are just that – a mad rush for a long time that ends up going nowhere and with that realization coming late in life. Or maybe it’s going somewhere in terms of provision and accumulation, but not in a way that fits the definition of a “calling”.
The checkered flag at the end of this racecourse is that coveted pot of gold toward the end of life’s rainbow called retirement, a finish line that may have blocked moving toward a true calling.
Job
A job is the most immediate and relatable term as it’s what we do every day to produce income, the fuel that keeps us on the aforementioned racecourse. The dictionary defines job as “a lump, chore or duty.” For some, that lump is “coal”. Consider that the average job is around 3.2 years and that during the average lifespan, most of us will have had a dozen or more “jobs”.
Does sound like a racetrack doesn’t it? Perhaps that old word denoting a calling is what is missing. As we zip past mid-life into our second half, it would be a good time to re-evaluate, resurrect and reapply vocation in its true, traditional meaning.
But I’m passing 50 – too late to find my “calling”?
It’s a pretty common question amongst mid-lifer’s. There’s that uneasy stirring going on deep in the gut. More days behind than ahead; lost enthusiasm for the chosen “racetrack”; a growing sense of aimlessness and emptiness; accumulation no longer important; the “who am I and why am I here”, “is it too late to make a difference?” questions that won’t go away.
It’s a critical fork-in-the-road time of life. One road gives in to the “social self” that has indoctrinated us into an artificial age-related culture and encourages us to remain a part of the crowd and stay-the-course to a landing called retirement.
The other road acknowledges a long-suppressed “essential self” that is insensitive to age and puts us on a trail that can enable a new takeoff rather than a landing. Only this time the takeoff is launched through a re-discovery and resurrection of our deepest dreams and desires but applied using our deepest talents and acquired skills.
Warning!
The second fork may mean you will, willingly, work yourself to (until) death.
Second warning!
You may:
Evidence has been in for a long time. Work is necessary for longer, healthier living.
Polls of centenarians have revealed that an astonishingly high percentage of them continue to work and that they rank working alongside being able to walk as one of the keys to their longevity.
The universe doesn’t want your parts back yet
I’m a huge fan and follower of Dan Sullivan, founder of Strategic Coach, the most successful entrepreneurial coaching program on the planet. In a recent podcast from a series entitled “Exponential Wisdom” that he does with Peter Diamandis, Dan stated that he feels he has “disenfranchised” most of the 18,000 entrepreneurs he has trained from the idea of retirement. He and Diamandis have tagged retirement as the “ultimate casualty.”
Together, they emphatically emphasize that “stopping and retirement means you are ready to retire your bits back to the universe.”
Not sure about you, I’m in no hurry.
Newsflash! Your Recruiter Practices Ageism!
By Oxford Dictionary definition, “ageist” as a noun is “a person with ageist views.” And “ageism” as a noun is “prejudice or discrimination on the basis of a person’s age.” The recruiter(s) you are working within your job search are practicing ageism.
There, I’ve said it. I’ve been a recruiter for 16 ½ years and I’ve been practicing ageism the entire time. Not because I’m prejudiced toward older people – good grief, I’m 75, a job- search and career-reinvention coach for over-50 folks and a passionate advocate for living a longer and healthier “second half” of life.
Ageism is built into the recruiting profession.
Just so you know, I’m not out to condemn this respectable profession. I’m one of ’em. I’ve befriended, partnered with, admired and enjoyed knowing many recruiters. It’s a great, but tough, profession. Recruiters are a special breed. They have to be to survive.
Look, they are working with creation’s most imperfect and unpredictable product on both ends of the recruiting equation – people. It takes grit, staying power, patience and extraordinary people, communications, and organization skills to succeed in this business. For the most part, recruiters are fiercely independent and hear a different set of drums– one of the reasons I like being around them.
None that I know are prejudicial ageists.
But we all discriminate every day. Someone gets picked, someone gets rejected. It’s inherent in the hiring process. But that discrimination may involve ageist-based decisions. It’s not a heart –based discriminatory decision. It’s a business-based decision.
So, why do I need to know this?
I’m writing this for the over-50 job seeker or encore-career candidate. That’s who needs to know and understand why the ageism element is embedded in the recruiting business.
First, please understand that, as a career coach, I advise against any job search strategy having more than 15-20% of the search effort dedicated to connecting with recruiters. It’s no different for someone over 50. Recruiters find people for jobs, they don’t find jobs for people. Unless you are a superstar, don’t expect any recruiter to do back flips because you called or sent your resume. The chances that he/she has a job order on her/his desk that you would fit into are as likely as you winning the Power Ball.
But there is another reason that recruiters should be a small part of your job search effort when you are over 50. It’s rare that they go on a dinosaur hunt!
OK, maybe a bit severe – I hear the “hrrumphs”. No, you are far from being a dinosaur, in your mind and in reality. But there’s a chance your recruiter perceives you that way personally (not likely), or, that seed has been planted through an off-the-record, “you-didn’t-hear-me-say-this” conversation” with the recruiter’s client (more likely).
Recruiters like to get paid
Remember the business model: he who writes the check dictates. So if your recruiter, in this little off-the-record conversation with his late-30-something client, is asked to bring in someone south of 50, your recruiter probably slips on the ageist hat. She/he is not going to put that check in jeopardy by getting on an anti-ageism soapbox even if they are a dedicated advocate. Not if they want to survive.
So, regardless of personal bent, your perceived recruiter ally may weed you out for this project, along with your fellow over-50 job seekers, and you’ll never know it. It all happens silently and secretly in the recruiting process.
Is your “dinosaur” showing?
Successful recruiters are very good sleuths. They can pick a “dinosaur–in-training” with little effort, especially with the advent of social media, particularly LinkedIn. Think of the ways that you can send off a dinosaur odor:
Look, let’s not whip this horse any deader with more do’s and don’ts. I’m just saying, be aware that the job market is rife with hidden, silent ageism and recruiters and their clients are both culpable – as a part of the business equation. That’s not likely to change. As recruiters, we get away with it because it’s all hidden from you, or from anybody for that matter. It’s business, man!
Here’s a couple of real-life examples:
I have a healthcare client who won’t accept any candidates over 45 for a front desk receptionist position because they “just can’t keep up with our pace and our electronic records technology.” I disagree with the premise but I bite my tongue and sidestep some obvious talent because my client has a bias based on one or two instances where someone didn’t perform. It’s a business decision driven by little things like having married a lady 47 years ago who still likes to sleep inside and eat warm food.
In another instance, while with a successful biosciences recruiting firm, I teamed with my boss to take a job order for a data analyst from a very large east-coast client. The hiring manager requested candidates “under 40, preferably with an undergrad degree from India, and 2 years of experience working with an American firm” I did the LinkedIn search, came up with over 150 suspects. In under an hour, my boss and I “discriminated” that list down to a manageable list of 25. Physical appearance and age (photo and length of work history) were key parts of the screening out process. Who knew but the two of us? Nobody.
This goes on every day inside of recruiting firms.
So, is there a solution coming with this problem?
First, don’t let your LinkedIn profile and resume scream “over-the-professional-hill”. Second, limit your reliance on recruiters and shift your search strategy to networking. Less than 10% of open positions are filled by independent recruiters. Over 80% of open positions are filled through referrals as a result of effective networking.
I had a coaching client, 58-years old, who networked herself successfully into three job interviews over the course of a month and then blew away a 30-something hiring manager at a large pharmaceutical firm by positioning herself as an experienced professional problem solver. Age concerns never surfaced as she demonstrated her understanding of the manager’s challenges and how she could help solve them. She’s in her dream job, making 25% more than her last job and has much more control over her time and life.
I encourage you to check out my five-part newsletter series entitled “Double-nickeled and Stuck! Getting re-employed at 55 or beyond.” Click here for Part One and follow it through all five pieces. I believe it will help you with tools to work around this, and other challenges, you may face in the job search process.
Is Your Nose Pressed Against Reality?
At the request of a dear friend whose wife has recently been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s, I read a book entitled “Jan’s Story”. It’s a very poignant book by Barry Peterson, acclaimed CBS reporter and foreign correspondent, about a man’s journey with his wife, Jan, a victim of early-onset Alzheimer’s.
Barry coined a phrase in the book that really grabbed and stuck with me. He learned that he had to daily “press his nose against the reality” of the finality of his wife’s condition and its impact on his life and health.
The phrase resonated with me because it’s not something I do well in my own life, even dealing with issues of far less magnitude. It was a not-so-subtle reminder that I, like most, wear masks, live in denial, and avoid confronting realities in my life to escape the pressure created by facing reality. For instance, that “gap” between where I am and where I really want to be.
Unaddressed realities seem to come clearer in later life as we are forced to “press our nose” against them and make major decisions while facing a shorter horizon.
I see this frequently as I engage potential candidates regarding executive or middle-management opportunities in my recruiting business. Because most of the positions call for deep experience and expertise in a given area, I’m often reaching out to professionals who have entered the “second half” or “third stage” of their lives – likely facing fewer days ahead than behind.
It doesn’t take long or too many questions to determine if a candidate is in denial about some of the realities of what lies ahead for them in this second half. Some have been granted “early, unintentional, temporary retirement” and, in some cases, are getting desperate for a job. Imminent unemployment is a reality for some as their corporate home morphs around them. Others are just restless and feeling that “stirring” called “is this all there is?”
On occasion, some of these candidates become coaching clients as the result of our dialog.
If I’m effective in my coaching relationship with them, I am able to help them “press their nose” against some unacknowledged realities.
Here are a few of the realities I see that people over 50 aren’t facing as they enter this late-life transition:
In my “reinvention” coaching, I am direct in my message that the last place to look for security today is in the corporate fold. If you are over 50 and have been downsized but intend to return to the corporate ranks, be prepared for two shocks. Unless your skills are current, exceptionally deep, and unique, you can count on: (1) an extended search, especially if self-directed (think one month for every $10k of salary); (2) your chances of duplicating your previous salary being pretty slim.
Are you at, or approaching, late mid-life and haven’t cracked a book or taken a course in the last 5-10 years that would bring your skills more in line with emerging technologies in your field? Have you “pressed your nose against the reality” of that necessity?
I’ll simply pass on the warning, as a recruiter and career coach having dealt with a number of 50+ professionals in that rut, the re-entry into employment under those conditions is a b****!
Example: An over-50 coaching client of mine was forced to “press his nose against reality” recently when he received a hard message from a recruiter he had contacted about a job that he really wanted. It was, on paper, a logical match, in the field he had been “riffed” from 10 months earlier.
The veteran recruiter laid it out succinctly and diplomatically for him: his clients won’t give him a look for two primary reasons: (1) extended unemployment with no part-time or lesser employment or volunteer work to show initiative and to maintain skills; (2) very limited skills- upgrade training in last five years of employment and no effort during his unemployment.
Fortunately, this gentleman has learned a hard lesson and landed on his feet. He has taken a somewhat risky straight commission sales position in a related field while he continues his search for his ideal position. It took moving some ego aside, but he will put himself in a role that will help him stay current, polish his skills and better position himself with employers and recruiters as his search continues.
Disruption is as given
Peter Diamandis, is an M.D. entrepreneur with degrees in molecular genetics and aerospace engineering who has started 15 different companies. In podcast #1 of a series entitled “Exponential Wisdom” that he does with Dan Sullivan of Strategic Coach (available free on I-tunes), he stated:
“Every company, every product, every service will become disrupted, obsoleted. You will either disrupt yourself or someone else will.”
Where does that leave you relative to reality as you look forward?
How susceptible is your company or industry to disruption by digital technology? And in what ways? Disruption doesn’t necessarily mean dissolution. Often it is a case of some new types of jobs being created as some are destroyed. Have you positioned yourself, educationally and politically, to move into those new roles?
How susceptible are your skills to digital disruption? Are you willing to re-don the learning hat and protect yourself against personal obsolescence?
Do some research on what professions are “safe”, if there is such a thing. Hint: my hair stylist and plumber don’t seem at all concerned.
Here’s an article posted on LinkedIn that weighs in on the subject.
What reality do you need to press your nose against? How willing are you to take the steps necessary to deal with that reality? Let me know your thoughts on this broad topic. What have you been doing to stay ahead of the disruption curve?
Are You “Flunking” Retirement- or About To?
Flunking retirement? Now there’s a strange concept. How does one “flunk” out of one of life’s most coveted and cherished prizes?
I first came across the concept five years ago when I read a book entitled “Don’t Retire, REWIRE!” by Jeri Sedlar and Rick Miners, former executive recruiters and a husband and wife team with 25+ years of experience working in the area of personal and professional transition.
Following hundreds of interactions with people in late life transitions and actual interviews with hundreds of pre-retirees and retirees, they discovered that the old adage “if you fail to plan, then plan to fail” comes into play in moving into and through retirement. It turns out, a significant number of people do, in fact, flunk retirement.
Outlooks and attitudes toward retirement differed amongst pre-retirees they interviewed and fell into one of four categories. Perhaps you’ll see yourself in one of these:
My general observation would say that #2 dominates. There is research out there that indicates 70% of retirees go into retirement with no semblance of a non-financial plan.
Doing it right
Some of this was borne out this week when I had coffee with some good friends, a couple I hadn’t connected with for over a decade. I’ll call them Carol and Ron. Carol had retired four years ago from her sales jobs with the same telecom company after 32 years (that is not a misprint), the last 4 or 5 of which was pure agony. Yes, she did it for the money – you probably would too if you were a consistent and award-winning six-figure earner.
She is 63. Ron is 64 and a successful sales rep in a different industry. Ron is not yet retired and is negotiating an exit plan with his company. He, unlike most his age, is in the driver’s seat. His company really needs him and doesn’t want him to retire.
I wanted to talk with them because I knew them to be disciplined and diligent in everything they do, especially when it came to the financial side of their life. I remembered they had worked with a financial planner for many years.
Carol and Ron are poster children for how to do it right. Plan. Save. Get good advice. Diversify. Pay off the house. Don’t overspend. No debt. Honestly, it was pretty humbling to see what they have done and hear how they’ve done it since I fall seriously short of it all.
Sitting there in a million dollar home, beautifully and comfortably upgraded, it was apparent that they are happy with what they had achieved on the financial side of their life.
Is that all there is?
As we discussed what full retirement for the two of them is going to look like, I detected a bit of a chink in the armor. The conversation didn’t go much beyond looking forward to more travel. Oh, and more painting on her part, a hobby she took up upon her retirement. And probably more golf for Ron.
They, for the most part, do the right things health-wise (except for Ron’s admitted attachment to beef) so they acknowledge the possibility of them both realizing a “longevity bonus”. Their financial planner has wisely helped them plan out their finances to age 90. I think they’ll get there. But I’m not sure they had really factored that into the vision for their retirement.
What I didn’t hear was much beyond pure leisure in that impending retired life.
And I get that. It’s normal and makes perfect sense. That diligence, that discipline, those years of hard work deserves a return. And what better payback than to see the world, go where few are able to go. And to kick back and pursue deferred personal passions.
Until it all turns into “is this all there is?”
The world will benefit
I think I know this couple and what is going to happen. They are going to flunk traditional retirement. And that’s a good thing. Because when they do, they, and we, will benefit.
This isn’t a La-z-boy couple. And I don’t think they are going to be a “world-traveler-look-at-my-photo-album” couple forever either. They are too diligent, too intelligent, too disciplined and too forward thinking to withdraw into the margins of life and society.
Be it three years, five years, I predict that failing at traditional retirement will happen for them. And we will all benefit because they will show up in meaningful service to their fellow man, in some way, some form, resurrecting the talents, skills, and experiences they have acquired and turning them back to work on behalf of society.
The form that this takes will be unique to them and is part of the adventure of what I’ll call “second half discovery and reinvention.”
An Attitude Instrument
I see the possibility that Ron and Carol will emerge as part of the growing ranks of the “forever young, forever passionate, and forever engaged”. This is an attitude that Mitch Anthony saw more prevalent as he did the research for his seminal book “The New Retirementality”. In these energetic second-halfers, he isolated five internal focuses and patterns steering their lives safely “through the existential seas of fulfilled and pleasurable living day by day.”
He calls these the Vitamin C’s of Successful Aging:
No one should feel bad about flunking a retirement built on a 125-year old false premise. Ron and Carol certainly won’t. Let’s hope more and more people will fail. Let’s fight the comparison-driven desire for comfort and inactivity, rise up against our youth-oriented culture and help prop this country back up by resurrecting the energy, vitality, creativity, and wisdom underneath the grey and wrinkles.
I suspect the theme here is upsetting to some – or perhaps many – because traditional retirement is so coveted and entrenched in our thinking. I’d love to hear from those opposed as well as those who agree. Scroll down and leave a comment and/or trip over to our Make Aging Work Facebook page and help us with a Like.
It’s Time to Get Real About Our Lifestyle – It’s Killing Us!!
“Americans are retiring later, dying sooner and sicker in-between”
That’s the headline to an article published in the Standard-Examiner on October 23, 2017. My thanks to fellow re-invention coach, blogger and author John Tarnoff of Boomer Reinvention for posting it on LinkedIn.
According to the Society of Actuaries (who could argue with such an exciting group?), the meteoric rise in U.S. average life expectancy may have begun to recede. According to their research, age-adjusted mortality rate – a measure of the number of deaths per year – rose 1.2 percent from 2014 to 2015. That’s the first year-over-year increase since 2005, and only the second rise greater than 1 percent since 1980.
Maybe we shouldn’t be surprised. After all, over 100,000+ years, we increased from an average life expectancy of 18 (Neanderthal) to 30 (Roman centurion) to 47 (your great-great grandma) to 80 today. Graphically, that looks like this – in just 100 years, life expectancy increased more than in all of human history.
Graph source: Ken Dychtwald, Agewave.com
Don’t all good things have an endpoint?
While the article is a bit dismaying it’s far from revelatory. I’m inclined to invoke the overworked cliché “the chickens are coming home to roost”.
We’ve gotten really good at adopting lifestyles that are killing us slowly – and early.
Following our phenomenal success in stamping out myriad infectious diseases, throttling infant mortality, cleaning up our air and water, improving food and water quality and distribution and improving education, we now succeed in finding ways to kill ourselves early in the face of all that we know about how to do the opposite.
Bio-scientific and biomedical research of the last 30 years have provided us with more than we need to know to continue to extend our average life expectancy and move toward our full biological potential of 120+ years.
Discoveries of how our bodies and brains function, down to the cellular level, leave us with little excuse for not extending our lives – or to at least keep them healthier as we age. But we seem to persist in ignoring the surprisingly simple recommendations that emerge from the research.
A receding life expectancy is hand-in-hand with a number of errant lifestyle signals that are emerging. To wit:
So what is a lazy, overweight, stressed-out, fast-food addict to do?
Nothing complicated, really. Actually, pretty simple. Not to be confused with easy. Difficult because it requires change and we don’t like change, especially the older we get.
How complicated is this health strategy?
We can be better than this!
Our lack of health care literacy, laziness, and capitulation to convenience sustains the $35 billion diet and the $26 billion health and fitness club industries year after year. Both see a big surge in revenue at the beginning of each year. They know its coming and they know the surge will wane and circle back around again the next year. They are both business models built on our naivete and inability to discipline ourselves.
There’s another industry – in fact, the largest on the planet – that thrives based on the same human behavior. That is our health-care –I’m sorry, our disease-care – system. It’s built on repair, not prevention. It doesn’t strive to turn off the spigot but rather to mop up the water, often when it’s too late. Pretty simple solutions – drug it or cut it out.
Would it be too “pollyannish” to propose we help disrupt all three industries by taking charge of our own health? Yeah, that’s a pretty radical, wasted thought. But, then again, is it? I’m trying to do my part. Hope you join me.
No doubt you have some opinions in this area. Leave me a comment, let me know your thoughts.