Wealthy? Check! Healthy? Not so much!

Maybe you saw the news article in your local paper this week from The Washington Post announcing that for the first time in a decade, the United States was crowned the world’s most competitive economy by the World Economic Forum in Davos.

I wasn’t on their invitation list so I didn’t know it was going on, or who makes up the forum.  Without my help, they scored the U.S. at 85.6 out of 100 against metrics that included infrastructure, information and communications technology, macroeconomic stability, health, skills and labor market.

Whew!  So glad we were able to claw our way back to the top.

But wait.  Three paragraphs later we see that the Forum also pointed out that the U.S. “is far behind most advanced economies in health, with life expectancy six years behind competitors Singapore and Japan.”

Maybe if we knew how to get healthy, that 85.6 could have bumped up against 100.

The fact is, we do know how to get healthy but it’s apparently just not a priority for most of us – until it is.  That’s usually after the fit hits the shan.  Then we are “all in” – and desperate to catch the horse long after it left the barn.

We know all we need to know

OK, I’m going to sound like a broken record so I hope you’ll forgive another rant or two.  Repetition is still the mother of learning last time I checked.

Fact:  The five major killers in the U.S. are heart disease, cancer, stroke, diabetes, and dementia.  That hasn’t changed in decades, other than some repositioning in the stack ranking.  Diabetes is now slowly working its way to the top as the biggest health threat.  Our own American Medical Association recently announced that half of our American population is either diabetic or pre-diabetic and 70% don’t know it.  OUCH!

Fact:  All five are, for the most part, lifestyle diseases and are subject to intervention.  Genetics plays, at most, a 30% role in the development of these diseases.  In the words of Dr. David Katz, a physician at the Yale School of Medicine, and founder of an organization called the Academy of Lifestyle Medicine:

“We already know all that we need to know to reduce, by 80%, the five major killers in our country.  We don’t need any more fancy drugs or equipment or more Nobel Prizes.  We know all we need to know today.”

 Fact:  the meteoric rise in U.S. average life expectancy appears to have peaked, actually going backward in 2015.   We’ve gotten very good at finding ways to kill ourselves early in the face of all that we know about how to do the opposite.

Fact:  We’re getting bigger, but not any taller.  This at the same time that Americans now spend more eating out than they do cooking at home.

 

Fact: The Standard American Diet (SAD) is deplorable and is killing us early.  According to the website Forks Over Knives:

  • 63% of America’s calories come from refined and processed foods (e.g. soft drinks, packaged snacks like potato chips, packaged desserts, etc.)
  • 25% of America’s calories come from animal-based foods
  • 12% of America’s calories come from plant-based foods
  • Unfortunately, half of the plant-based calories (6%) come from french fries. That means only 6% of America’s calories are coming from health-promoting fruits, vegetables, whole grains, nuts, and seeds.

There’s a good reason we abbreviate standard American diet to S.A.D. The standard American diet leads to standard American diseases that lead to standard American deaths.

Fact: Our healthcare system cares little about what we eat and our food industry cares little about our health.  Need proof?  (1)  Has your primary care physician ever initiated a conversation with you about what you eat? Not!  There’s no box to check for that category in his electronic medical record.  (2) Burger King just confirmed that meat and cheese cause nightmare diseases.  The fast-food chain just launched the “Nightmare King” sandwich – a quarter pound of beef, a chicken filet, cheese, bacon mayonnaise and onions –  which they openly claim is “clinically proven to induce nightmares.” 

Fact:  We’ve gotten very sedentary.  The CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics just this year announced that only 23% of Americans meet national physical activity guidelines which, for adults, are 150 minutes of moderate or 75 minutes of vigorous exercise per week.  Do the math:  that means we can’t find .007% of our week to get our heart rate up.   But we can find, on average 49 hours (29%) to veg out in front of the TV or on social media.  A lack of physical exercise is now being equated to the equivalent of having a major disease.

What Can We Do?

Few things are simpler and more impactful than taking charge of our own health.  The biggest overall killer is healthcare illiteracy combined with complacency and lethargy, all of which are addressable.

The formula is simple – but not easy, considering the deeply ingrained habits we function in.

Here’s an optimized plan as offered up by Dr. Henry Lodge, co-author of the best-selling book “Younger Next Year.” It’s referred to as “Harry’s Rules”:

  1. Exercise six days a week for the rest of your life
  2. Do serious aerobic exercise four days a week for the rest of your life
  3. Do serious strength training, with weights, two days a week for the rest of your life.
  4. Spend less than you make
  5. Quit eating crap!
  6. Care
  7. Connect and commit

Simple, but not easy.  SAD if we don’t.

How To Make Aging Work

I added to my hero list this week.

During another boring 24-Hour Fitness workout this week, my aging I-pod Classic served up a James Altucher podcast interview with William Shatner of Startrek, Boston Legal, and Priceline fame.

Now 87, Shatner looks 20-years younger and is living like his hair is on fire (yes, he still has plenty)  – writing books; doing a country-western album, a blues album, and a Christmas album; touring internationally; producing, directing and performing on NYC Broadway stage; speaking.

It’s obvious Shatner doesn’t spend much time thinking about his endpoint. He’s too busy.

He subscribes to George Burn’s viewpoint on dying:

“How can I die?  I’m booked”

And

“As long as you’re working, you stay young.”

One of Shatner’s opening comments was that “all the 87 year-olds I know are dead. They didn’t follow my advice – I told them ‘don’t die’, but they died.  Why did they die?  Because they changed their mind about living”.

No mystery to him about it.  “They decided they were through.”

He’s far from through.

Try the schedule described above and see if you could make it happen, at any age, let alone 87.

It strikes me that Shatner epitomizes the merits of refusing to retire and of continuing to work. He validates what we need more of to sustain – in fact, build – our vigor and vitality as we enter and move through the third stage of life.

For example:

  1. Doing something we’ve never done before. Just a few Shatner examples: c&w, blues and Christmas album; interview and dinner with Stephen Hawkings shortly before Hawking’s death; writing a book.
  2. Staying physically active e.g. touring globally. I’m sure he does more physically – he appears to be in better shape than the loose-cannon, Denny Crane, in Boston Legal.
  3. Challenging ourselves mentally. Shatner is no slouch here.  Honestly, I bailed on the podcast when Altucher added world-renowned theoretical physicist, Dr. Michio Kaku, to the conversation and the three of them went off into “woo-woo” land talking about quantum physics, string field theory, hyperspace and the “physics of the impossible.”  Shatner’s mental acuity and ability to not only engage in this type of dialog but to lead it, was amazing.  What happened to the myth about declining brain-power as we age? (BTW, Kaku is no spring chicken – he’s 71).
  4. Always having something that isn’t complete. It’s apparent from Shatner’s conversation that he doesn’t hesitate to start something new while he has other things going.  He’s not concerned about each activity being perfect – in fact, admits to a number of stinkers in his prolific list of projects.  For him, it’s just constant forward movement. No living from the rear-view mirror for him.

On this last point, I’m reminded of one of the principles espoused by world-renowned entrepreneurial/business coach Dan Sullivan, founder of Strategic Coach.  Sullivan opposes completing one’s life.  He argues persuasively that our culturally-infused notion that it’s important to “wrap up one’s life” and “leave a legacy” is like planning for a funeral and is counter-productive and life-shortening.

This leave-a-legacy mindset is a product of what Sullivan calls one of the many “general narratives” that our culture instills in us that rob us of the potential we can bring forward into this third stage of life.  It’s a general narrative that says “I’ve only got 70 or 80 years on this mudball so I should start winding down as I approach that period of my life.”

That’s giving up on one’s uniqueness and on one’s self as a creator.  It’s apparent that Shatner and Sullivan don’t buy into that general narrative.

At 74, Sullivan’s whole idea for his future– and for the professional and personal lives of his coaching students – is an “ever-expanding incompleteness” as opposed to bringing life to some sort of legacy.  He teaches “always expanding one’s present into a bigger future” with “each tomorrow starting at a higher level.”  Any legacy – if it were important – will take care of itself.

We waste energy worrying about when the end is coming. It’s not for us to determine – nature owns that and has her own unpredictable timetable.

Sullivan intends to leave a total mess of in-process creative projects for his team to straighten out or complete when he checks out – a rather refreshing new spin on the concept of a legacy.  I suspect this is a concept that resonates with Shatner as well.

Shatner, Sullivan and probably hundreds or thousands of other third-act participants are busting several myths (or “general narratives”) that need busting.   To name a few:

  1. That creativity dies as we age.
  2. That brainpower deteriorates as we age and senescence is automatic.
  3. That “labor-to-leisure” retirement is good for the body and the soul.
  4. That unhappiness accompanies growing old. (NOTE: the nadir of unhappiness is age 47 – see this article.)

Fascination and motivation lie available for the taking for all of us by creating every day; by striving to make our future bigger than our past regardless of age.  It starts with rediscovering what we are uniquely gifted to be able to do and linking that with a vision and sense of purpose for this third act.

I’ll wrap by adding to the overuse of an overused but important cliché:

It’s never too late to start, but always too early to quit.

Do you have a unique giftedness deep inside that cultural expectations/general narratives have stolen or covered over – one that you can resurrect and apply against a vision for your future that is bigger than your past?  Does the concept of an “incomplete life” versus a “legacy” resonate with you?   Your thoughts on either or both are welcome – scroll down and give us your thoughts.

Regain Your Brain – for $79!!

Would $79 and 12 hours be too much for you to spend to avoid Alzheimer’s?

If so, kill this blog and return to – whatever.

Too close to home

Alzheimer’s recently became a reality for my wife and me when the wife of a dear friend, half of a close 40-year friendship, was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s.

We feel fortunate that it hasn’t occurred in our immediate or extended family, and that, so far, this is a single incident within our reasonably normal-sized circle of friends.  Nonetheless, this single incident has validated all that we’ve read or heard about the devastating impact of this brain disease – and more.

The speed with which this has transformed a beautiful, wonderful woman into one that we can’t recognize or who can’t recognize us has been stunning – and deeply saddening.

Following this development, I have had my radar up for any information related to answers to solving this devastating disease.  What I have found, until very recently, has been pretty grim.  This summarizes some of what I’ve found:

  • It’s generally accepted that 1 in 3 of us will develop Alzheimer’s in America.
  • While medicine has made significant progress against heart disease and several types of cancer, progress against Alzheimer’s has remained elusive. Time after time, a “promising” new drug has failed to come through.
  • Industry-research service EvaluatePharma revealed in a 2017 study that of the 20 most promising future drugs coming to market, none are aimed at Alzheimer’s.
  • Many of the major pharmaceutical industries are reducing or eliminating entirely their departments in the area of Alzheimer’s and dementia research!
  • In January of this year, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals ended their research to discover new medications for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. They laid off over 300 scientists in their labs and closed down the entire division.
  • In an interview, one recently laid-off neuroscientist said, “The current medication for Alzheimer’s disease is approved, essentially, because it’s better than nothing. There’s nothing else at the moment.”
  • The reason? Shareholder value.

There’s much more I could share, but I realize that I only have people’s attention for about 1200 words/six minutes if I’m lucky, even on a life-and-death issue.  So let me cut to the chase.

We’re getting answers

About 10 days ago, a promo-email hit my mailbox that my radar picked up immediately – a “free” 12-episode video series entitled “Regain Your Brain: Awakening From Alzheimer’s”. 

Being cheap and a knowledge-accumulator, I was all over it.  I just completed about 20 hours of watching and taking extensive notes from this series.   It’s a collection of interviews with some of the top neurologists, psychologists, neurosurgeons and functional medicine physicians in the country.

I’m going to try to summarize my key takeaways from the series below – a tough task because there are so many.  Just let me say first that we are getting answers to solving the Alzheimer’s puzzle, but they aren’t going to come from your doctor’s office or from your local pharmacy.

More on that in a moment.

Invest in your healthy future

Here’s the deal.

The free version of the series went away – they left each video up for 24 hours.  But the entire series, plus a plethora of other supplemental information is available in three different packages ranging from $79 to $189.  It’s all explained here.

At a minimum, own the DVD of the video series ($79 package) and find twelve hours at your leisure to digest the information therein.

Disclaimer: 

Please know, that I have no affiliation with the producing organization, nor do I stand to benefit one nickel if you purchase the series.  With very few exceptions, I found it highly credible and thought-provoking.  It unveils a lot of information we aren’t going to hear from our hospital-system-ensnared, insurance-company-directed primary care docs.

It addresses some questions a lot of us may be asking ourselves, such as…

  • Why haven’t I heard of these therapies before?
  • Why have I been led to believe we’re hopeless in the face of these diseases?
  • Why hasn’t my doctor made me aware of these methods of prevention and recovery?
  • Why does the media insist that there’s “no cure” for Alzheimer’s or dementia?
  • Why do the drug companies ignore this research, coming up short again and again?

Sadly, the answer to all of these questions comes down to money.

My takeaway

I’ll try to briefly summarize my take away from this experience.  You may draw different conclusions should you invest in the series.

  1. Dementia and Alzheimer’s, in particular, is a preventable disease. Reversal of advanced stages of Alzheimer’s remains out of reach, although the series references examples of reversal of early onset.  The central message is that Alzheimer’s is preventable because we now know, through extensive brain research, what brings it on.  The brain is susceptible to the very same lifestyle-initiated pathogens that keep heart-disease our #1 killer and diabetes as the greatest threat to our national health.   Namely, poor diet, lack of exercise, hormonal imbalance, vitamin deficiency, exposure to toxins, amongst other factors.
  2. Your primary care physician doesn’t (care to) know this stuff. I respect my primary-care doc – I’ve been with him for 25 years.  But he’s a traditional “drug it or cut it” doc.  He’s never initiated a conversation about my homocysteine levels, asked me about my diet, suggested I visit a Vitamin Shoppe for some key missing vitamin supplements, had me tested for toxins in my system, or for hormonal imbalance.  The blood tests he is authorized to authorize by his hospital system and covered by my insurance is cursory at best.  He and his hospital system are paid to cure, not to prevent.  Prevention doesn’t pay.
  3. Big pharma isn’t likely to help. As noted above, Big Pharma is bailing out. And that’s a good thing.  The industry only knows to try to catch the horse after it has left the barn, not preventing the horse from leaving the barn.  Functional/Personalized Medicine is beginning to demonstrate that there are myriad of effective natural remedies that Big Pharma won’t bother with because of, well – no shareholder value.
  4. Functional/Personalized Medicine is the future. A growing segment of our healthcare system is Functional Medicine – referred to also as Holistic Medicine or Personalized Medicine.  It is within this emerging area of medicine that analysis and testing are taking place that isolate the pathogens, toxins, hormonal deficiencies and lifestyle habits that result in Alzheimer’s.  You can learn more about Functional Medicine at this site.
  5. We control our “dementia destiny”. Twenty years ago, the brain was considered a fixed, unalterable organ that was destined for deterioration over time.  We now know, unequivocally, that this is false.  Our brain is a “use or lose it” organ that can grow new cells at any age (neurogenesis) and is alterable (neuroplasticity) based on lifestyle decisions that we make.  WE CAN DIRECTLY AFFECT OUR CHANCES OF DEVELOPING ALZHEIMER’S.

I think I hear what you’re thinking.  OK, I’m 55/60/70 – isn’t it too late?  Maybe.  But, as with many things, it’s never too late to start but always too early to quit.  If you are reading this and making some sense of it, then I say it’s not too late.  This series helped me appreciate the fact that there are now ways to know if we are headed toward this disease and to take the steps to head it off and even reverse the early symptoms.

The research has been done, the treatment pathways for prevention have been laid out.  But we will have to go outside our traditional disease-care system to participate.

I hope you’ll invest in this series.  If you do, drop me a note or scroll down and leave a comment with your impression or with any thoughts that you have along these lines of dementia prevention.

I plan to dig more into this area of Functional Medicine and to publish more articles in the future on this emerging dimension of healthcare.

 

 

 

Is It Too Late to Be Amazing?

I recently read a veteran career coach’s advice for displaced or dissatisfied middle-agers wishing to re-enter the job market or make a late-life career change.

His advice:  In today’s changing workplace, you will have to come across as – AMAZING!

That’s worth pondering.

What makes up amazing?  The reality is, most of us don’t think of ourselves as amazing, although deep down we can be – or should be.

Honesty can hurt here – truth is most of us at this mid-life point are coming off of extended stretches at or near the top of the bell curve – neither slug nor superstar.  Comfortable, convenient, middle-of-the-road, don’t-rock-the-boat, needs-based existence.

So now I’m suddenly expected to move to the far right of the bell curve and be amazing?  Uh, I think I’m gonna need some major help here.

This coach’s message has to do with image, personal branding, positioning, preparedness, self-confidence, energy – the components necessary to conduct a successful job search at this stage of life where the challenges are magnitudes greater than what it took 20,10, even 5 years ago.

His point is that every component of the job search process needs to be, well – amazing.  The resume needs to be a Picasso in terms of content and structure; presence on LinkedIn and other social media must be top-notch; commitment to, and energy for, an effective networking strategy must be beyond the pale; elevator speech development, interviewing skills practice, attitude maintenance, self-management discipline – all need to be – amazing.

This coach’s advice is spot on – for the mechanics of a job search.  Question is – is it realistic?  How many can get there?

Pretty tall order, especially if your ego just took a hit because of an unexpected termination.  It’s pretty hard to think amazing when you feel like a slug and that the whole world is “a tuxedo and you are a pair of brown shoes.” (my thanks to long deceased comedian George Gobel for that – doubt that he cares).

My experience in coaching folks in this position is that getting to amazing with all this requires more sustained effort and attitude adjustment than most are willing to undertake.

Why?

Because they don’t see themselves as amazing.

In their mind, all this effort may seem fraudulent, sort of like putting lipstick on a pig.  Twenty-plus years in the grinding corporate world tends to bury our most amazing qualities.

Be your true amazing self at work, and you will either (1) bump up against a manager who will be threatened by you and find a way to remove the threat or (2) be seen as an outsider that doesn’t fit or belong or (3) you will realize you need to take your amazing self outside of the confines of a job.

Needs vs wants

Re-entering the job market or making a corporate career change is typically a needs-based move.  It’s mortgage/groceries/college tuition/orthodontics/golf club membership/luxury car payment/retirement savings/home repair coverage.

Rarely is this type of move a “wants-based” move that acknowledges and satisfies a deep interest or passion and resurrects and ignites one’s uniqueness or essential self.

Certainly, there are exceptions, but working for someone, building someone else’s dream makes it difficult to get to the true amazing self.

By the time we have 15, 20, 25 years of this, it seems pretty late to try to be the true amazing self that one’s unique ability or essential self can produce.  It’s pretty well stamped down and covered over – maybe even forgotten.

So is it too late?

There is plenty of time to be amazing, regardless of age.

Let’s just do a “what if?”

Suppose you are 55 and in good physical shape.  You have a better than 50% chance that you will live to 90.  That means you’ve got 42% left.  With the right attitude and continued good health and wellness habits, you probably fit the “live long, die short” model – that is, your morbidity period should be short, at least shorter than for most. So, we’ll need to take a couple of percentage points off to account for your brief period of dementia, drool and Depends.

There it is.  Could you make “amazing” happen for yourself with 40% – 30+ years – left?

Well, yeah!!

This is the point where most personal development pundits inject the over-worked examples of Colonel Sanders, Grandma Moses, and Ray Kroc.  But I won’t do that to you.

OK bunko, tell me how to be amazing.

OK – here are five steps that will help – in order of priority:

  1. Protect your health. Amazing doesn’t happen if you feel like s__t!  Become health care literate. Know your body; learn your biology; understand your biomarkers; take control of your health and don’t turn it over to your doc – co-partner with him/her but stay in charge; get your heart rate up every day and stop eating crap!
  2. Adopt an attitude of gratitude and altitude. Much of success emanates from an attitude of gratitude.  You are gifted.  Start each day with a mental list of the good things in your life that you are grateful for.  And then think lofty thoughts, dust off the dreams and be grateful that you are now a masterpiece-in-the-making.
  3. Find your “essential self” or your “uniqueability”. Invest in and digest Martha Beck’s “Finding Your Own North Star: Claiming the Life You Were Meant to Live.”  From that, you will learn how to identify your essential self and how to:  “- stop conforming to the pre-designated patterns offered by your cultural environment.  Instead, you will turn your life into a work of art – an absolutely original expression of your unique skills and preferences.”

  Or understand the concept of “uniqueability”, the success principle taught by the planet’s most successful entrepreneur coach, Dan Sullivan of Strategic      Coach.  It’s that unique giftedness that all of us have that we’ve yet to manifest.  You can learn all about it and how it leads to “amazing” by listening       to podcasts #137-140 at 10xTalk.com.

  1. Dust off the dormant/suppressed dreams. What were you drawn to and got you most excited when you were 6, 8, 10?  There is likely a link between that and your essential self/uniqueability.   What passions or deep interests have you tabled in favor of dedicating yourself to a paycheck and mortgage coverage?  Think on these things, let them resurface – they are a path to realizing “amazing.”  My July 9, 2018  article featuring the story of a successful late-life entrepreneur is a good example.
  2. Find a mentor or coach. Being your amazing self will take time and commitment.  You can get the journey started and benefit from the low-cost/no-cost coaching available online and in books.  And these are essential tools but, by themselves, extend the journey.  Engaging an experienced life or career coach in addition to these tools will accelerate the process by helping remove the clutter, build your confidence and hold you accountable to the steps on the journey.

We’d all be amazing if it were easy.  But being amazing doesn’t so much fit the way our culture thinks and works.  We need a lot of non-amazing and conformity for our system to work – a lot of folks that are content at the top or to the left side of the bell curve.

But if you got this far in this article, that’s not you.  You’ve already said, “I’m amazing.” And now realize it’s “never too late to start but always too soon to quit.”

Or, to paraphrase the late, great Zig Ziglar:  “You don’t have to be great (amazing) to start, but you have to start to be great (amazing).”

Let me know if I can help you get your journey started.  Email me gary@makeagingwork.com or call my office at 720-344-7784 and let’s chat.

If you are on that journey now, tell us how it is going – leave us a comment below.

 

 

OK, 24-Hour Fitness – Can the News!!

I have a couple of confessions.

First, I’ve fallen into a bad habit of reading the newspaper in the morning over breakfast. For me, it’s the Denver Post, a newspaper that has become a shadow of its former self, considered by some as best used for bird-cage bottoms instead of news.

Second, I always come away from the experience (a) having LEARNED NOTHING HELPFUL and (b) having set a marginal tone for the rest of the day.

My lizard brain/amygdala loves it.  That’s what it thrives on.  It’s looking for bad news – like the lion behind the bush – so as to enact my fight-or-flight mechanism for my protection.  But, I’m not hearing of too many lions-in-the-bushes here in suburban Denver, so it’s an unnecessary activation of cortisol injection into my system through largely unnecessary drivel that has virtually no impact on my life.

So why do I even have it delivered?   

Because it encases the sports page and the crossword puzzle and soduko my wife does every day.

I gotta have the sports page because I’m a Broncos/Rockies/Nuggets fan (in that order), plus I find that sportswriters are well above average writers – certainly better than the reporters at the news desk who are trained under the guiding light of “bad news sells” and “if it bleeds, it leads.”

I was reminded of the senselessness of this morning activity – and of tuning in the evening network news –  in an article by Ryan Holiday in Medium.com today: “Why Everyone Should Watch Less News.”

Holiday is a strategist and author with quite a cult following in the business and sports world.  As one might expect of an author, he suggests watching less news and reading more books because “just about anything bound between two covers will teach you something more than the latest headlines – and will do far more in regards to settling your soul.”

I recall doing a Toastmaster speech on the state of reading a number of years ago.  In my research, I discovered that the average number of books read in the U.S., at the time, was around 15 and the median (midpoint) number of books read was around 4.

That average is pulled up by the gonzo readers like myself.  I’ve averaged 60+ books/year for the last 10 years with only two novels in the mix.  Yes, I know – pretty weird.  It’s the way I’m wired and when the weirdness of it all starts nagging me, I remind myself that Bill Gates averages a book a week, Warren Buffett reads five hours a day, and Teddy Roosevelt reportedly read a book a day.

Think 60 books a year is overwhelming?

Not so much. Think on this formula

60 books x 50,000 words / book (avg size of a typical non-fiction book) = 3,000,000 words

3,000,000 words / 300 wpm (slightly above average reading speed) = 10,000 minutes

10,000 minutes / 60 = 167 hours

167 hours/52 weeks = 3.3 hours/week

Average time spent by Americans on (see this article by Charles Chu: “The Simple Truth Behind Reading 200 Books a Year):

Social media – 608 hours/yr = 11.7 hours/week

TV – 1642 hours/yr = 31.6 hours/week

I won’t insult you by going further and doing the math for you.

 

 

 

In that speech in 2013, I reported that reading is declining in this country.  No doubt, it hasn’t gotten better.  I parsed out some stats for that presentation that really caught my attention along with a couple of stats that are the consequences of this decline:

  1. % of U.S. adults who are unable to read at the eighth-grade level – 50%.
  2. % of U.S. high school students who will never read a book after high school – 33%
  3. % of college graduates who will never read another book after graduating from college – 42%
  4. % of families in the U.S. who did not buy a book in 2012 – 80%
  5. % of adults who had not been in a bookstore in the past five years – 70%
  6. According to the NEA, the average 15-24-year-old watches 2 hours of TV and does 7 minutes of leisurely reading each day.
  7. In a U.S. population of over 300 million, popular movie gems in 2013 such as “The Matrix” and “Fast and Furious” sold one million DVDs while the 2011 top-selling, Pulitzer Prize-winning novel only sold 135,000 copies.

What about the consequences of all this.  Again, some revealing facts:

  1. 2/3 of students who cannot read proficiently by the end of the 4th grade will end up in jail or on welfare.
  2. 80-85% of juveniles who face trial in the juvenile court system and over 60 % of prison inmates are functionally illiterate.
  3. Low literacy directly costs the healthcare industry $70 million every year.

Need more reasons to read?

Holiday continues (bolding is mine):

 “While research has shown that visually shocking and upsetting news can contribute to anxiety, sleeping trouble, raise cortisol levels and even trigger PTSD symptoms, a University of Sussex study found that just six minutes reading a book can reduce stress levels up to 68%. A study done by former journalist turned positive psychology researcher Michelle Geilan found that watching just a few minutes of negative news in the morning increases the chances of viewers reporting having had a bad day by 27%, while Barnes and Noble just reported soaring sales for books that help people deal with anxiety and find happiness. Life Time Fitness, a gym chain with locations in 27 states, recently decided that tuning their TVs to FOX News and CNN was antithetical to their mission of making people healthier, so they’ve banned the news from the gym.”

So, I’m going public. 

I’m giving up the morning newspaper (except for the sports page) and avoiding TV news altogether.

You are welcome to hold my feet to the fire on this.  Stop by for breakfast or an evening beer anytime to check me out.

And since I work out there 5-6 days a week, I’m going to suggest to 24-Hour Fitness that they block Fox and CNN just like Lifetime Fitness.  I’m not sure the Lululemon or the tattoo, tank top, and tiny-testicle crowd pays all that much attention, much-preferring mirror-viewing.  But I think it would be a good symbolic gesture, don’t you?

Maybe they could upgrade their equipment and replace all the burned out overhead lights while they are at it.

Help Wanted: Revolutionaries

 

I’m hanging out a “Help Wanted” sign.

Position?  Revolutionary – or rebel will do.

Pay? Don’t inquire – there isn’t any.

Benefits?  Intangible, personal, internal, mental.

Qualifications?  Middle age or later; mostly pissed-off at our culture; contrarian-by-nature/nurture; thick-skinned; immune to derision; Master degree or Ph.D. in toe-stubbing; audacious ager.

Requirements:  Stand in the breach; take a stand and some serious body blows in exchange for promoting a culture change.

Mission: Help straighten out a world that is “out of whack!”

In 2017, the 50-85+ age demographic in the U.S. reached 32% of the population.  That’s the fastest-growing segment of the U.S. population.

You’d think a group that large and growing would deserve a little more respect.

Not happening!  Have you noticed?

So I’m up for seeing if we can turn that around.  Wanna join me?

Oh, you’re not feeling disrespected?

Great!  You are either already a revolutionary – or you’re in the waiting line for the disrespect – or maybe you’ve never felt any other way and don’t recognize it.

What’s the disrespect?  Our culture disrespects (or ignores) our biology i.e. our natural life processes.

That’s an argument posed by neuropsychologist Dr. Mario Martinez in his book “The Mindbody Self.”  His research is debunking the myths that view human biology “as mechanistic processes void of cultural influence in the causes of health and longevity.”

He advocates that it’s possible to “reweave our cultural fabric to release what no longer serves you and reclaim the personal excellence you were taught to ignore.”

He refers to the work in this area done by anthropologist Margaret Clark who advocates that anthropology and gerontology would benefit by working together.

Specifically, she proposes: “—that aging is a series of adaptations to the social systems embedded in cultures.  In other words, aging is strongly affected by how we adjust (adapt) to the constraints of our cultures.”

Some of the constraints that Martinez and Clark refer to that are present in our culture today are:

  • Defined retirement age
  • Age limits for hiring
  • Gender restrictions
  • Family authority and expectations
  • Medical biases
  • Rites of passage to elderly status

Martinez goes on further to remind us of other cultural influences, most of which can go either way in terms of benefit or detriment to our health and longevity:

  • What we eat
  • Our level of activity based on age
  • Where we live
  • How much risk we take in our lives
  • Life expectancy
  • Rituals that enhance or diminish our immune system’s defense against foreign bodies

We’ve had many “cultural editors” and “cultural co-authors” to help us down this path of cultural captivity – parents, peers, professors, pundits, politicians, policies – to name a few.

Martinez makes this seminal statement elsewhere in the book:

“Growing older is the passage of time; aging is what you do with your time based on your cultural beliefs.  (my underline).  Middle-age is one of those portals where culture will tell you how to behave, dress and what to expect – all without biological evidence to support that stage of your life.”

Centenarians are revolutionaries

Martinez’ research has included extensive study of centenarians worldwide.   There were a number of things about centenarians that stood out which he refers to it as the “centenarian consciousness”:

  1. The so-called “longevity gene” was found in only 35% of centenarians and there was only a 25% correlation between their advanced age and their parent’s longevity. In other words, a genetics mindset went out the window.
  2. They are contrarian in their view of what their culture expects of them.
  3. Resilience is a core attribute. Setbacks, major illnesses, losses of loved ones and other major challenges are common with nearly all centenarians.
  4. They are devoid of envy, replacing it with an attitude of appreciation and gratitude.
  5. Very few of them retire.

Although Martinez doesn’t allude to this, I suspect that centenarians had adopted this contrarian attitude early in life in response to an awareness of the restrictive nature of many of our cultural influences.

It needs to be our time

– before we are completely run over.

Marc Freedman, in his excellent book “The Big Shift: Navigating the New Stage Beyond Midlife”, articulates well what we are facing.  He humorously references the orthodoxy that has developed and continues to mount, helped along by the media, academia, youth movement, et.al:

“America (and much of the developed world) is hurtling toward a situation in which tens of millions of people, arguably the biggest group in society, and a mighty political force to boot, are about to dominate the scene.  At somewhere around age sixty, they will, pretty much overnight, become the elderly, pass out of the “working-age population,” become incompetent and incontinent, bankrupt the health care system, vote for hefty increases in public spending on their retirement at the expense of everyone else, turn the Sun Belt into a giant golf course, and ignite a war that will, in the subtitle of the 2010 book ‘Shock of Gray’, pit ‘Young Against Old, Child Against Parent, Worker Against Boss, Company Against Rival, and Nation Against Nation.’”

His conclusion – which I agree with and which underscores my posting a Help Wanted appeal – is this:

We’re becoming “ – a nation in which the largest segment of society is at loose ends and under-engaged –  consigned to a kind of identity oblivion, fighting age discrimination, facing foreclosed opportunities, mired in personal stagnation, and bereft of purpose.”

Ouch!  Count me out!!

Ready to sign on?

I hope all this p_____s you off just a little.  I hope being viewed as “incompetent and incontinent” at any age stirs you up a little.  I hope you are concerned that going forward from middle-age that your accumulated skills, talents, and dreams are underappreciated and expected to go to the sidelines.

Short on revolutionary experience?

No marches, no signs, no confrontations for this role.

Training manual?  Yes – see above: centenarian consciousness

Slow?  You bet!

Sticks and stones? Yep!  Your culture-infused friends, family, and co-workers will be viewing you skeptically from their cultural fishbowl and may be unkind in their attitudes and/or comments.

Gratifying?  Absolutely, especially if you like going against the grain.

We best affect change in others through our own example.  That’s the route to a cultural change.  Gandhi provides a guidepost: “Be the change you want to see in others.”

I look forward to having you in the revolution.  Scroll down and leave us your thoughts.  Are you a contrarian, swimming upstream with your aspirations and goals?  How do you deal with the resistance?  What has been the biggest challenge you’ve faced?

If You Don’t Take Care of Your Body, Where Will You Live?

 I just went through my annual physical check-up with my PCP (If you don’t know what that stands for, we really should talk).  He’s been doing the stethoscope, pointy thing up the nose and in the ears, rubber hammer and rubber-gloved, “roll over on your side” exam on me for 20+ years.

I’m lucky – I usually get 30-40 minutes with him.  For two reasons, I guess.

One, with my 16 years as a healthcare recruiter, he and I invariably end up spending a little time “talking shop” about the challenges he faces running a very busy primary care practice.

Yes, he’s frustrated with the bureaucracy, the electronic medical record requirements, the constantly changing rules, the dropping reimbursement, the paperwork, the patient complacency. He truly loves what he does and just wants to be a doctor.  But, as with all primary care physicians, that’s harder and harder to do

Second, I know I ask more and deeper questions than he normally gets because I’m more tuned into my biology than most of the patients he sees.  I decided over ten years ago to become a student of how this 24 x 7 immune system of 35 trillion cells that I walk around in is designed to work.

Well, the exam went quite well – except for one small glitch.

Elimination of meat and dairy and a 12-lb weight loss have lowered my total cholesterol 15 points to 135 in a year. (P.S. Below 150 is the truly safe range, not just below 200 despite what your pharma-company-influenced PCP will tell you.)  Blood pressure safe – almost too low.   All components of the blood panel safely within range.

All systems go.

Then the glitch.  He said: “You are a very healthy 76-year old – more like a 65-year old.”

Whaa????  65?  How ‘bout 55?

OK.  Ego aside – I’ll take it. Thanks, Doc!

I intend to live to 112 ½ so this body is what I’ll be living in for another 35  34 ½ years.

I know – that’s nuts.  Some of the people I know hope to be taken out back and shot if they get to 90.

If I don’t pay attention to this cellular house I live in, maintain it, help it do its thing – well, I guess where I end up living could get sort of ugly for a long time. My intent is for that “ugly” period to be real short – perhaps like a finger snap.  But certainly no longer than a season.  My progeny don’t deserve a protracted period of needles, nursing homes or neurological nonsense.

I’ll get old and die, just like you.  But, that’s different than aging.  Getting old and dying is immutable – how I choose to age is optional.

No warranty, no trade-in, no owner’s manual

At current chemical prices, you can trade your body in for $3.50.

Organ donation or giving it up to a cadaver lab for aspiring PCP’s to probe is the closest thing we’ve got to a trade-in.

Health insurance isn’t exactly a warranty, although we seem to think of it that way. Oh, look, Mabel – I can get that fixed for a $35 co-pay!!

And still no owner’s manual accompanying dismissal from the newborn nursery.

A century ago, we didn’t know enough about our biology to write an effective owner’s manual.  Today we do, but I suspect it would be soon ignored if it were written.

Suppose we did have a warranty, or a trade-in, or an owner’s manual.  Would that change our tendency to know more about how our Ford Explorer’s catalytic converter works than how our endocrinology can lengthen or shorten our lives?   Or how our digestive system impacts our thinking ability?  Or how – well just about anything about our biology?

Color me skeptical.

The owner’s manual for my wife’s aging Acura MDX is 298 pages.  I can replace the engine in that car for about $2,000.

An easy-to-follow owner’s manual for good health could probably be contained in a half-dozen pages – in large, double-spaced type.  To replace my heart in the U.S. can approach $1.4 million, my liver $813,000.

We know to put good oil in the pan and good gas in the tank of our car.  Yet we persistently dump junk food and bad chemicals into the most expensive transport system on the planet to repair, pound for pound.

Maybe an owner’s manual would change that, but I doubt it.  Our taste buds are held captive by a food industry that knows and cares little about our health. And our commitment to really simple health and wellness habits have succumbed to comfort, convenience, and co-pays.

What a way to treat the most magnificent machine ever developed.

So, for many of us, a protracted period of frailty is in the forecast.  Oh yes, we are living longer.  A 65-year-old today has a 50% chance of reaching 90.  What that stat doesn’t reveal is that for far too many of us, this extended longevity that we rave about is lived in technology-supported agony, isolation, and immobility.

We have the option to be “Younger Next Year” regardless of age.  The book by that same name is a great place to start to understand why and how.  Or “The Roadmap to 100” and his earlier book “Dare to Be 100” by retired Stanford geriatric physician, Dr. Walter Bortz are tremendous no-holds-barred, easy to read “owner’s manuals” for longer, healthier living.

You can also pick up a few wellness pearls from my free e-book: “Achieving Your Full-Life Potential: Five Easy Steps to Living Longer, Healthier, and With More Purpose.”  Click here to download it.

Thanks for being a loyal reader.  If you like the articles, tell a friend about us.   Your opinion and insight counts, so leave us a comment below.

 

You Are Likely Committing Murder Everyday

I’m going public and confess to murder.

Fortunately, I won’t be jailed for this murder, although one could argue that I should be.  A physical jail isn’t needed because the penalty I pay for this murder is tougher than an actual jail cell.

My jail time is mental.

The murder victim in my crime is time.

My commission of the crime is relentless – weekly, daily, hourly.  My most serious jail time comes at the end of a day or week when I look back in wonder at where it went and how absent or non-productive I was.  That’s when I realize I’ve been guilty of a crime – a murder of the most valuable, but unreplenishable, resource I have – time.

Tony Robbins in his book Awaken the Giant Within: How to Take Immediate Control of Your Mental, Emotional, Physical and Financial Destiny” asks: “How do you define your use of time?  Are you spending it, wasting it, or killing it? It’s been said that killing time isn’t murder, it’s suicide.”

The mental jail I put myself into is for murder, not suicide, thankfully.  But Tony’s rant resonates.  Time has taken on greater significance each day as the number of days ahead of me narrow relative to those behind.

My sensitivity to this shrinking horizon took on increasing influence a quarter-century ago as I moved into my fifties – and it hasn’t let up.

There are no filling stations for time

In a look back in one of my journals recently, I came across a quote about time that I had captured from author MJ DeMarco in a book entitled “The Millionaire Fastlane”.  He says: “We are born rich (with a full tank of gas) and will die broke. Time is the great equalizer. There are no filling stations for time – your one fill-up occurred the moment you took your first breath.”

That makes us kinda like that Visa gift card we got at Christmas – someone pumps in a number you can invest, waste or kill, depending on how you choose to use it.  And once it’s empty, no value.  It occurred to me that we probably give much more thought to how we spend a Visa gift card than we do to how we are spending our time.

You’ve heard it said that we spend more time planning a backyard BBQ than we do planning our lives.

Retirement murders time

As a devoted non-retiree and unretirement activist, I’m usually the odd-man-out in any discussion about the merits of retirement.  Part of my argument against traditional retirement involves time and the distorted use of it as we prepare for and experience full retirement.

My argument starts with the fact that our culture, helped along with our deeply-entrenched retirement entitlement mindset, puts a “use-by stamp” on us as our years pile up. An artificial finish line – retirement at 65 – drawn over 80 years ago still guides much of our thinking and our time use. We distort our use of time from young adulthood into middle-age to strive for that coveted retirement goal where we can then further intensify our misuse of time.  Our culture infers that our time, in our later years, is less valuable. It’s time to go to the sidelines, the park bench, the elder warehouse – where idle time is the expectation on the part of our culture and often the goal of the retiree.

Those committed to achieving a traditional retirement sacrifice their time in the present to try to dig out of the savings gap between where they are and what they feel they will need to achieve their retirement financial goals.

In the U.S., we’ve built a $1 trillion dollar financial planning industry around treating people as a math number and capitalizing on their fear or dread of not reaching that nirvana called retirement.

That is what Roger Whitney calls the “savings gap trap.”  Whitney is a highly experienced Certified Financial Planner and author of a wonderful book on this topic entitled “Rock Retirement: A Simple Guide to Help You Take Control and be More Optimistic About the Future.”

He points out that the savings needed to cover the cost of a 30-40 year retirement – a growing possibility today – is an insurmountable number.  Yet the financial planning industry persists in using the “save more, invest more” equation to guide their clients, often with recommendations that call for “sacrificing life today in order to save or sacrificing your life tomorrow, or a bit of both.”

But really, what choice do these planners have?  They are salespeople trained to sell insurance and investment products.  Non-financial life issues weren’t in their training manuals and don’t pay commissions.  One can hardly blame them for being somewhat blind to the time use issue that their recommendations can generate.

So, what’s your point?

Sorry, it would be so easy to go off into the weeds at this point, if I haven’t already.  Let me cut to the chase by saying that our cultural “entitlement” called retirement promotes a leapfrogging from a productive middle age to a non-productive, often aimless old age and compresses the time in which that transition takes place.  To me, that is murdering precious, creative, productive, life-changing time by throwing it to the wind and saying “I’m done.”

We have lots of evidence of this murderous process.

  • As recently as 1995, the Social Security system determined that the average number of social security checks issued was 29 – hardly a nirvana.
  • A generation ago, IBM did a study of its pensioners and found that the average number of pension checks issued before demise was 24.
  • Extensive studies of cultures worldwide with unusually high levels of centenarians (reference Dan Buettner’s book, “Blue Zones”) find that traditional retirement rarely exists and that gratitude for each day (time consciousness) prevails. Okinawans, for instance, can claim one of the highest concentrations of centenarians of any culture on the planet. Yet, they do not have a word equivalent to retirement in their language and no retirement homes in their culture.
  • A study called the RP 2000 Mortality Study of men 50-70 confirms the importance of time usage by revealing that the death rates of those still working were roughly half the death rates of men the same age who were not working.

It’s not easy being an outlier

Centenarians are outliers. Where our culture tells us that our intellectual and physical functions diminish with the passing of time, healthy centenarians have largely rejected that notion by accepting the fact that they will grow old and die but choosing how they will age.  Most take each day as a timeless gift and demonstrate amazing resilience in overcoming adversity.

Yet, in the face of this evidence of the possibility of a fruitful, healthy life to 100 or beyond, to suggest living to that age as a personal goal invites a culturally-conditioned rejection and categorization as kooky, weird, out-of-touch with reality, etc., etc.

How are you going to deal with your longevity bonus?

If I were to ask you how you would use a 30-40 year, post-middle-age time span, what would your culturally-influenced instincts tell you?  Would they say “wind down” or “rewind?”  Would it say “takeoff” or “landing?”  Would it say “crescendo” or “diminuendo?”   Would it say “I’m done” or “I’m inspired?”

I’m hoping that there will be a realization of the fact that this third-age period between middle-age and true old age is rife with the potential for murderous, culturally-induced time abuse.

  • Will it be movies or mentoring?
  • Will it be TV or teaching?
  • Will it Lazy-boy or learning?
  • Will it be bingo or biking?
  • Will it be conformist or contrarian?
  • Will it be vacation or vocation?

Life is a series of choices, each taking a chunk of time.  Our culture does much to show us how to waste it, lose it, abuse it.  But we can all be outliers and reject cultural perceptions.  And nowhere is that more important or potentially more impactful than in this period between our middle age and true old age – our “third age.”

What are your thoughts about all this?  Are you an outlier?  Are you an “audacious ager?”  If you are, I’d like to meet you, talk with you.   Leave a comment below.  Email me at gary@makeagingwork.com.  Subscribe to these weekly articles at www.makeagingwork.com

 

What’s Your Life Tempo – Crescendo or Diminuendo?

I’m a slightly above-average guitar player.  One would hope so since I started playing in 1959.  We’re talking Bill Haley and the Comets and early Elvis time zone, folks.

About a dozen years ago, I discovered a player by the name of Tommy Emmanuel.  If you are an acoustic guitar player or aficionado, you know this native Australian to be unarguably the greatest acoustic player on the planet.  Chet Atkins, a Tommy mentor, endowed him with a Certified Guitar Player designation – one of only four or five such crowns awarded by Atkins before he passed.

I consider Tommy E. my guitar mentor.  I have nearly every one of his CD’s.  I’m learning from his instructional DVDs and tablature books.  I’ve attended every performance he has had in the Denver area over the last 10 years.  I’ve actually met him twice, have two autographed instructional books and have a photo with him (it’s a bad cell phone photo so it’s staying in the camera gallery – trust me on it!)

To give you an idea of this man’s talent (and in hopes of adding you to his fan club) click this link to one of his masterful creations.  As a testament to his talent and popularity, you can find hundreds of YouTube videos of his performances.

One thing I’ve observed is that Tommy seems to live his life in constant crescendo, which for you non-musicians means “an increase in intensity”.  He is a prolific songwriter, active teacher and does over 300 live performances a year worldwide.  Now in his 60’s, he doesn’t seem to be slowing down.

Despite being able to do things on an acoustic guitar that are often mind-blowing, Tommy’s credo is “to be better tomorrow than I am today.”  I remember him saying that he doesn’t let a day go by without working on and refining his craft.  This after nearly six decades playing the instrument.

When he is performing, Tommy sometimes will pour on the “crescendo” and leave the planet with his incredible technique, creativity, and mastery of the instrument.  I find myself kind of tuning him out when he soars into the stratosphere.

I like him best when he pours his heart and incredible connection with his music into his softer, slower songs – like “Questions” or “Somewhere Over the Rainbow” or “Digger’s Waltz”.  That’s when Tommy reverts to “diminuendo”, which means “a decrease in loudness and intensity.”  He lowers the volume and the pace but without sacrificing the emotion.

I thought of Tommy this morning as I was reviewing some notes I had made in a journal a few years ago while reading Steven Covey’s “Seven Habits of Highly Successful People.” Covey asks: “Are you living your life in ‘crescendo’ or ‘diminuendo’?”

His definitions for the terms, however, stray a bit from the musical meanings:

  • Crescendo – greater energy and volume, strength and striving
  • Diminuendo – lower the volume, back off, play it safe, become passive, whisper away your life

Tommy E. may “lower the volume” but he doesn’t back off, play it safe, show passivity and has by no means been whispering away his life. He is one of the most ubiquitous, energetic musicians out there.

But I get where Covey is going with the question.  Are you winding up, or winding down?

I’ve asked myself:  at 76, is sustainable crescendo possible or realistic?  Should I accept Covey’s definition of diminuendo as a given, a necessity, a rite, an assumption, an automatic in my life as many seem to do?

Our culture would have us play to diminuendo as we age.  The signs are all around us: a continuing (but diminishing) emphasis on the unnatural concept of retirement; a proliferation of retirement communities; youth-oriented media and institutions; open and rampant age discrimination.

I’m taking a stand for the crescendo role.

But I’ll admit it’s harder than I thought to make the leap.  Naps come way too easy each day; the drive to seek adventure and newness has a pretty thick crust of “you’re too old” enculturation to cut through.  Learning is as deep but takes a good bit longer.  A look in the mirror in the morning generates the question: “Do I really want to put new strings on that??”

But I’ve “whispered away” enough of my life already.  Got some serious catching up to do – and that takes crescendo.

Crescendo into our 70’s, 80’s, 90’s is possible.  We have a multitude of examples to turn to.  There are the notable outliers like billionaires Ken Langone, T. Boone Pickens and Warren Buffett that I wrote about in my 7/2/18 blog “Time For a New Cultural Portal”.  But there are thousands of centenarians – the fastest growing segment of our population percentage-wise – that will attest to the validity and empowerment of never-ending crescendo.

When we give in to diminuendo, we might as well – in the words of Dan Sullivan – “send an email to the universe that it can start taking the parts back.”

Tommy’s crescendo attitude and his creative perfectionism are highly inspirational.  But, someday, the universe will take Tommy’s parts back – I hope it isn’t in my lifetime.   But when it does, I’d bet on it happening while he is soaring “off the planet” in one of his musical creations, not slowing down for a minute.

Shouldn’t that be how we all should go?

How’s Your Vitality and Happiness?  Not sure?  Test it!

You may already be familiar with Dan Buettner, National Geographic Fellow, explorer, educator, and author of a very popular book on longevity entitled “Blue Zones: Lessons for Living Longer From the People Who’ve Lived the Longest,”  He’s the guy who assembled a group of demographers and sent them all over the globe to find the areas of the world where people lived the longest.  Then he tossed their findings to a group of statisticians for analysis and correlation.

Five areas on the globe emerged as unique relative to global averages of length-of-life and late-life vitality: Okinawa, Japan; Sardinia, Italy; Nicoya, Costa Rica; Ikaria, Greece; Lodi, California.

The findings of this extensive effort are widely recognized and quoted.  Buettner has become a prominent name in the growing campaign against our western lifestyle as it pertains to our overall health and longevity.

It’s a worthy read, if for no other reason than to learn what the common factors were across these five Blue Zones that contributed to the extraordinary longevity and amazing late-life health.  I’ll just leave you a hint since I’m sure you will rush to buy the book based on my recommendation (inserting winking emoji!)

Yep, diet, exercise, sleep, low stress and social engagement pretty well sum it up.  There you have the cliff notes on the cliff notes.

With this article, however, I want to call your attention to a fun little tool that Buettner has put out there to test your “true vitality” and “true happiness”. I guess “fun” may not be the best description depending on what your test results are.   But if your results come back “un-fun”, at least the test includes suggestions that will get it closer to fun.

Two tests, eight minutes

Go to this site for the True Vitality Test.  This 3-minute test “calculates your life expectancy and how long you’ll stay healthy” and will “send you personalized recommendations for getting the most good years out of life.”  It’s all kept private.

Then you can go to the True Happiness Test  and do a second test (five minutes) “based on the leading scientific research into well-being” that will “help you improve your environment to maximize your happiness.”  Same deal – a personalized report with recommendations.

OK, it’s all free and it’s designed to lead you to purchase a course that goes deeper in each area.  You know the game by now if you spend any time in the online world.  I’m a thief, out and out.  I steal everything free that I can and never (well, almost never) bite for the “special offer” that follows.

But, I like these two tests and feel they had some substance.  I admit I may have been a bit swayed because I liked the results.  To wit:

  • On 2/9/18, I took the Vitality Test the first time and it predicted my life expectancy to be 92.6 against the average of 76 (which is where I am – whew!).  Since I’m committed to living beyond 100, this test result bothered me.  I looked at the recommendations that accompanied the test.  I found, and added, a couple that I wasn’t doing that made sense.  So when I took the test again on 7/7/18, my life expectancy prospects had improved to 96.9.   Good – getting closer. Note to self:  continue to work on the recommendations.
  • On the same day – 7/7/18 – I took the True Happiness Test and it came back A+, the top possible bracket. It says I scored high in
    • PURPOSE: Your passion, drive, and sense of meaning and connection.
    • PLEASURE: Your everyday positive emotions and experiences.
    • PRIDE: Your sense of satisfaction in the major areas of your life.

Aren’t I wonderful?

I shared the results with my wife.  She gave me the same eye-roll on the age thing that I suspect you may have done.  And on the happiness things, she simply said: “When are you going to tell your face?”

Some work to be done there. I’m just not that exciting to be around and not an exuder.  I guess the internal peace and happiness I feel still has difficulty peeking out.

I suspect that you are highly skeptical about the validity of these tests since they’re free.  I get it.  You get what you pay for, right?  Free always has a hook.

You can easily ignore or spit out the hook on this one.  And you might just gain something.

Look at it this way.  How many eight-minute chunks do you waste every day doing something stupid, mindless or unproductive? Some days, my chunks seem to be legion.  So if I pull one little “pearl of applicable knowledge” out of that eight minutes, I’ve got an ROI.

That’s what I felt I got.  A simple activity that added “1%” to my personal growth.  Do something like that every day and I’ve improved my life 365%.  My life has space for all of that improvement!

How about yours?

If you try it, let me know what you think. Scroll down and leave a comment.