Four Steps to a Bountiful Post-career Harvest

“For the unlearned, old age is winter; for the learned, it is the season of harvest.” Hasidic saying

I’m curious. Has your financial planner – assuming you are working with one, which I hope you are –  ever dropped the word “harvest” into your conversation as you pour over the charts and graphs and talk “what’s next?”

Let’s look at the word first. Merriam Webster says this:

  • Noun: “the act of gathering in a crop; the product or reward of effort.
  • Verb: “reap.”

I may be wrong, but I can’t imagine that word getting a lot of play in insurance sales school.

Now, maybe you are one of the fortunate few who have engaged a financial planner or adviser that thinks “beyond the numbers” and pays more than lip service to the non-financial components of retirement. Financial planners are important, valuable, and necessary. But, chances are they aren’t going to lead you into a deep discussion of the four biggest concerns that retirees have beyond money: (1) boredom; (2) loss of identity; (3) becoming irrelevant; (4) deteriorating health.

Planners sell financial products, not psychological counseling.

How can we avoid these four concerns, reap a reward for our first-half effort, experience a purposeful “harvest”, and avoid a retirement winter?


Here are four suggestions that may help.

1. Build a new “friends list.” With your retirement, we can safely assume you disengaged from the largest, longest-lasting, and one of the most important sets of relationships in your life when you left work. No problem, you say. I’ll stay in touch with most of them. Guess again – 90% of them forgot your name as they gulped down a slice of your retirement cake and watched you vacate the building. Don’t expect return calls – they are all entwined in their own sets of issues still building somebody else’s dream.

Start now to build a new list. Who can you add to keep it alive and vibrant? Who do you know casually that you want to go deeper with because, well, they don’t have time for ageist, senior-citizen-type conversations and they light up a room when they enter. Who can you add that would agree to a plan to hold each other accountable for not heading to geezerville?

Don’t let retirement become a winter void of sustaining relationships. Social isolation is a killer – ARRP reminds us that it is equivalent to smoking 15 cigarettes a day.

2. Commit to a holistic self-care plan. Sorry, but your planner didn’t get a lick of training on how your or his/her biology works while in insurance school. Oh, I appreciate that you will be advised to “take care of yourself.” But what about some detail? That’s on you. Now, perhaps for the first time, you need to be the true CEO of your health.

Your self-care plan should include a relationship with a primary-care provider that goes beyond the typical “drug or cut-it-out” mentality and can engage you in a holistic conversation about your bio-markers, general health condition, what to include, and what to avoid – a trained clinician who is willing to partner with you in your self-care plan. Your “back nine” years will probably require making up for some marginal “front nine” lifestyle patterns, so it shouldn’t be treated casually. Those bad first-half habits have an insidious nature that creep up and manifest on an accelerating basis in our 50s and 60s unless accounted for and slowed down or stopped early in the retirement years.

Consider a commitment to learning about the basics of your cellular biology. Can you explain to me how your body works as effectively as you can about how your lawnmower or dishwasher works?  Probably not, if you an American. Why should you when the “fix” is only a $35 copay away? A physician once told me that the biggest killer in our culture is healthcare illiteracy. If we did appreciate how our body works, would we still take 35% of our meals through the side window of our cars? Or spend, on average (as retirees), 49 hours a week one with the La-z-Boy and voice-activated remote.

The book “Younger Next Year: Live Strong, Fit, and Sexy – Until You’re 80 and Beyond” turned the ship for me eight years ago, particularly Chapter Five. Yes, it was written 16 years ago, but your cellular structure hasn’t changed in billions of years. Dr. Lodge’s chapter will help you understand the consequences – good and bad – of your daily treatment of your 100-trillion-cell immune system.

3. Accelerate your learning. Wait, haven’t I done enough of that? Truth is, you probably had pretty well stopped any kind of serious learning a couple of decades ago. Just as you want that physical self to remain vibrant, you need to work even harder at keeping that 2 1/2 pounds of fatty acid between your temples in even better shape.

Fifty years ago, even neurologists believed that neurological senescence was automatic and unalterable. Fortunately, they are all now dead. We’ve learned tons about the brain since then and know that we can build new neural connections for as long as we want. Yep, it’s slower and harder, but what isn’t after 60? What are you not doing that you always wanted to do because you feel it would be too hard or take too much time? There’s your starting point. Stretch yourself mentally with something that takes you outside your comfort zone. Evidence mounts that doing so is antidotal to dementia.

4.Let your purpose find you and go fix something. Have you noticed that a lot of things in our culture are broken right now? What if you headed off the boredom and loss-of-identity that accompanies full-stop retirement and dusted off your peculiarity, your uniqueness and packaged it up with the skills and experiences of 40 years of work and went out and “made a ruckus” aimed at fixing something. What if you got back in the ring – on your terms, at your pace, doing what you may have forgotten you are/were really, really good at and loved doing? You don’t have to look far to find something that needs fixing. Substitute “re-creation” for “recreation” and go change something. And when that’s fixed, go change something else.

Here’s a quote from a recent Chip Conley blog to ponder:

“While recreation and re-creation are not mutually exclusive, the latter promises the elixir of life. An alchemical cocktail of curiosity and wisdom, garnished with fresh sprigs of a beginner’s mind, creativity, and service. To regenerate is to make new again. To retire is to withdraw into seclusion.”

 

I spent a bunch of my formative years engaged in farming activities. I’ve seen a harvest or two. I’ve also seen what happens if the harvest doesn’t happen. It’s called rot. Rot can be a post-career option. It is for many. But you, dear reader, are a harvester. And society will be better for it.

Chasing “Yet.” Please tell me you haven’t stopped.

My son got me a Samsung tablet for my 79th birthday last month. Probably out of sympathy.  Really an amazing surprise considering he’s endured 44 years of my personality.

It’s a great gift because it’s an upgrade from my cell phone as a feed for my large appetite for YouTube and other video podcasts to overcome the boredom of my daily encounters with the treadmill and upright bike.

I’ve gotten into Matthew McConaughey (MM) lately.  I know, I’m late for that party. He’s been “hot” on the podcast and speaking circuit for a while judging from the number of his YouTube videos.  It may have been the straightforward truth he spoke at the commencement speech at the University of Houston that kick-started all this. It’s worth a watch and a listen.

It’s hard not to like him as an actor. I find it easy to like him even more as a “normal” homo sapien who seems to have avoided the Hollywood varnish/veneer and gotten down to thinking deeply about and sorting out really meaningful life issues – and sharing them for our consumption and benefit.

I’ve also been deep into the “gospel according to Seth Godin” for the last year or so. Seth is considered the master of marketing and goes against the grain on conventional thinking about most everything, especially about meaningful success and achievement.

When I hear a concept from the mouths of both Godin and MM, stated slightly differently, my radar goes up.

Time to pay attention.


Chasing “yet”

MM calls it “chasing yet.” It’s a guiding principle in his life:  that he’ll go to his grave “chasing yet.” As in, I’m not “there yet” but I’m moving in that direction knowing that I’ll never get “there” completely. It’s a fundamental tenet of mastery. Never abandoning the process, not focusing on outcomes. Finding joy in a daily journey tethered to his uniqueness.

Godin, in his latest, and best, book (#19 or #20, I forget which) “The Practice: Shipping Creative Work”, takes the same line in different words, exposing the principle of “so far” and “not yet.” As in (from “The Practice”):

“You haven’t reached your goals (so far). You’re not as good at your skill as you want to be (not yet).

You are struggling to find the courage to create (so far).

This is fabulous news. 

Persistent and consistent effort over time can yield results.

“So far” and “not yet” are the foundations of every successful journey.”


Retirement and “chasing yet.”

OK, I guess you knew I was going here.

Retirement suppresses “chasing yet.”

I wrote two weeks ago about not giving up on our “unrepeatable uniqueness”, about not ignoring those inborn childhood “inclinations.” About considering the hours already accumulated against that 10,000 hours that may define our mastery. About not drinking the cultural Koolaid that says it’s time to shut all that down and just “enjoy life” with the inference that the enjoyment is to be found in ending the chase.

“Chasing yet” puts another layer on the invalidation of traditional retirement as the way to finish out.

Now, I admit, I’ve not heard either MM or Godin comment on the concept of retirement. But I’ll take any bets that say they both are retirement advocates. I don’t think there is room in their mindsets for that dissonance.

Why does Warren Buffett still show up every morning at the office and read financial reports and newspapers five hours a day?

Why does William Shatner, at 88, still perform, travel the world, cut C&W albums, live life like his hair is on fire.

They, along with a growing cohort, all disdain retirement. They are still “chasing yet” finding joy in a journey without concern for the outcomes.


What’s your “yet?”

If you are retired, can you resurrect it?

If you are planning retirement, where does it fit in your non-financial retirement plan? Or does it exist at all?

How far back in your neural circuitry have you allowed your uniqueness and inclinations to retreat in favor of an unnatural concept that goes against our very biology.


We need you to be “more peculiar.”

One of the more unusual and refreshing concepts that Seth Godin touts is to increase your peculiarity. That thought terrifies my cohort and immediate family as I push the limits there already. But Godin is simply saying that your peculiarity is your uniqueness and that it deserves to be deepened and shared.

Your peculiarity may be – probably is – your “yet.”

My peculiarity is writing something every day because that’s how I’m currently “chasing yet” knowing that I’ll never be the best writer and that lots of folks won’t like what I say and that all that is OK.

It’s a goalless “yet” and the outcomes defy definition.  But the journey produces the joy. Reassurance and reliance on outcomes deny the joy.

Our third age, our “back nine” is the time to let our peculiarity flourish. We are called to not deny others the benefit.


What is your “peculiarity?” Are you “chasing yet?” Please share your thoughts – leave a comment below. If you haven’t, you can join our growing list of readers at www.makeagingwork.com. Join the tribe – and bring a friend with you.

So You Think You’ve “Peaked.” Probably Not – Read On!

A question came up recently on Quora.com that intrigued me and motivated me to put the pencil to paper with a response. The question asked:

“At what age is your prime age?”

Fertile ground for thought and opinion, don’t you agree?

So I stepped up with my two cents worth. Here’s an expanded version.


There would seem, to me, to be two different types of prime: physical and psychological.

Physical prime is easier to define. Generally, we reach our physical prime in our mid-to-late 20’s and a gradual decline begins from there. My understanding is that this physical decline in terms of muscle mass and strength really begins to accelerate in the mid-to-late-thirties and picks up serious speed as we approach our fifties unless offset through strength training.

Mental prime may be more elusive as it would seem to be unique to each of us and have so many dimensions. Your psychological/emotional prime is likely to look different and have a different timeline than mine or everyone else’s.


I did some research and found this interesting article on the topic published in 2017 by Business Insider:

Here Are The Ages You Peak at Everything Throughout Life

Here’s the chart that they developed which shows interesting prime ages for a broad selection of phenomena:

As the article emphasized, this is not a controlled study and the points mark the middle of an age range. So these are averages. That’s important for you, my readers, to know because you are all above average on so many levels.

Some things are pretty obvious. For instance, you’re 60 and deciding to learn to speak Russian. Good luck with that. It appears you are 5 decades too late to expect significant results from that worthwhile mental-gymnastics effort.


Double-dipping “Life Satisfaction”

It’s interesting to note, from the chart, that life satisfaction pops up peaking in two spots: age 23 and again at 69 but with psychological wellbeing peaking at 82. This is all according to science.

At 79, I honestly don’t remember what my life satisfaction level was at 23. I was between stints in college and mostly a “wandering generality” into muscle cars and bar hopping. Maybe it’s saying that there is some life satisfaction in wanderlust which was a pretty popular lifestyle with the reprobates I hung with in mid-1960s Cheyenne, Wyoming. Fortunately, sanity returned and I went back for my third and final run at a college degree (P.S. I succeeded). My biggest contribution through that meandering stretch was to the economic welfare of pubs and gas stations.

I will, on the other hand, attest to there being greater life satisfaction at 69 – and in the 10 years since – than all the earlier times in my life. But then, that’s just me. It was in my seventh decade that I grew to realize that my “good spots” came when I stayed true to my birthright of uniqueness and didn’t succumb to other people’s opinions and the pressure of cultural expectations. Unfortunately, it took me that long to recognize and acknowledge that uniqueness – or, as I wrote last week, my “inclinations.”

That discovery, in and of itself, is not an easy or common one. So few of us ever acknowledge and honor our true inborn giftedness. Our culture snags us with our outdated educational system, pounds us with cultural expectations, and hooks us into a life built around comparison instead of our uniqueness.

I’m reminded of the article written by Australian hospice nurse, Bronnie Ware, who spent many years with patients who were in the last few weeks of their lives and who had gone home to die.  In her article “Regrets of the Dying, she shares the five most common regrets that they expressed in their final days. Far and away, the most common regret was:

“I wish I’d had the courage to live a life true to myself, not the life others expected of me.”


Age 82 is a head-fake!

I don’t expect anyone in my cohort to claim they haven’t passed their physical peak. They know my bull**** filter, albeit not great, wouldn’t let that one through.

But what about that “psychological wellbeing” peak at 82? Seems kinda early, don’t ya think? Couldn’t we move that one out another decade or two – and make it a really brief peak, like overnight, maybe? As in “die young, as late as possible.” Sort of like the Okinawans have tended to do – live happy and purposeful close to 100 and then check out with virtually no morbidity period. Unlike we Americans with our average 10 1/2 years of morbidity.

What’s the Okinawan magic? Prior to being invaded and infected with western culture, it was mostly a strong sense of purpose built around community and family combined with non-western lifestyle diet and movement choices. Historically, Okinawans haven’t relinquished their identity and sense of purpose to retirement – they have no word for the concept in their vocabulary.

So maybe we move that 82 to 92 or 97 or – heaven forbid – to 102. Rather than hopping off the cliff from labor-to-leisure at the “obligatory 65”, we turn our retirement into a purposeful, service-filled period that is balanced with labor, leisure, and learning. Your thing, built around your “inclinations”, on your timetable, at your speed, in whatever form you choose but with an eye to changing something that needs changing.

Why not? Remember, these are all averages – and you’re not!


Hope you are coming out of this COVID year unscathed. We appreciate you sticking around and giving us a read. Let us know your thoughts on this peak issue. Scroll down and leave a comment or drop me an email at gary@makeagingwork.com

Oh, by the way. I just launched my new website for the other part of my life – my resume writing, LinkedIn presence development, and career transition and retirement coaching. Give us a visit over at www.turningpointcareerservices.com and schedule a call if you would like to discuss any of the services I’m offering.

Don’t Give Up Your “Unrepeatable Uniqueness.”

I’ll bet you’ve heard this before:

  • No two snowflakes are ever the same. You are a snowflake.
  • You are a unique, unrepeatable collection of DNA.
  • You have a genetic makeup that has never happened before and won’t be repeated again.

It’s true. You are “unrepeatably unique.”


 

So what? Am I supposed to do something with that esoteric insight?

 

Hang with me – I think I can make this less esoteric.


For a big chunk of my life, I have been fascinated by this thing called Mastery. For some time, I harbored a resentment that I wasn’t especially gifted, a prodigy, a genius, or born of genius parents, or raised in the right neighborhood (rural S.E. Wyoming is not known for its production of world changers).

I faced a path to mastery blocked by my DNA and heritage – at least, in my mind. I carried that psychological ball-and-chain around for a long time.

That ignorance began to dissolve when I read a book entitled “Mastery: The Keys to Success and Long-term Fulfillment” by George Leonard. In it, Leonard defines mastery this way:

“It resists definition yet can be instantly recognized. It comes in many varieties, yet follows certain unchanging laws. It brings rich rewards, yet is not really a goal or a destination but rather a process, a journey. We call this journey mastery, and tend to assume that it requires a special ticket available only to those born with exceptional abilities. But, mastery isn’t reserved for the supertalented or even for those who are fortunate enough to have gotten an early start. It’s available to anyone who is willing to get on the path and stay on it – regardless of age, sex, or previous experience.”

If this is all true, why do we see so few true masters? What was it about Mozart, or Tiger Woods, or Einstein, or Leonardo de Vinci, or Tommy Emmanuel (my acoustic guitar master/hero), or Seth Godin (marketing guru) that took them to the master category?

There’s no magic to any and all of their mastery achievement. None of these people are or were prodigies.

Prodigies almost never become masters. They fizzle out.

What these masters did was to (1) honor their uniqueness and deepest internal drivers and (2) hop onto a path that they never abandoned, regardless of the twists and turns.

Leonard offers up an explanation of why the path to mastery is so rare:

“The trouble is that we have few, if any, maps to guide us on the journey or even to show us how to find the path. The modern world, in fact, can be viewed as a prodigious conspiracy against mastery. We’re constantly bombarded with promises of immediate gratification, instant success, and fast, temporary relief, all of which lead in exactly the wrong direction.”

In his view, this anti-mastery mentality not only prevents us from developing our potential skills but threatens our health, education, career, relationships, and perhaps “our national economic viability.”

So there I had an answer – I had been conspired against by the very culture I existed in. Who knew?


A “Third Age Master?” Resurrect your inner genius.

In my continued pursuit of an understanding of the nuances of mastery, I dived into a book that’s been gathering dust for a couple of years on my crowded bookshelf: Robert Greene’s “Mastery.” It’s a 300+ page, dense, small-font project with guaranteed nap-generating qualities if you aren’t an off-kilter reader like yours truly. It takes Leonard’s writing to the next level.

Greene pretty well clears up any mystery about mastery using a plethora of real-life examples, ranging from Mozart to Einstein to Buckminster Fuller to John Coltrane.

Honestly, the book started out feeding my frustration at being severely short of having mastered anything other than sitting and thinking about mastery.

But, Greene jolted me out of my drift toward a mid-page nap with the statement that “intensity of effort lies at the heart of mastery” and that:

“-at the core of this intensity of effort is in fact a quality that is genetic and inborn – not talent or brilliance, which is something that must be developed, but rather a deep and powerful inclination toward a particular subject. 

This inclination is a reflection of a person’s uniqueness. This uniqueness is not something merely poetic or philosophical – it is a scientific fact that genetically, every one of us is unique, our exact genetic makeup has never happened before and will never be repeated. This uniqueness is revealed to us through the preferences we innately feel for particular activities or subjects of study.”

I bolded the word “inclination” because, as I read on, it occurred to me that it’s the word that best describes what nearly all of us fail to honor in our lives.

How did yours truly, a wandering-generality from rural Wyoming who relished time alone to think, who liked to read and write, and who most enjoyed his three semesters as a journalism major in college end up selling wood-fiber ceiling tile to lumberyards in St. Louis?

It turns out that this anomaly isn’t all that hard to sort out. Like most, my “uniqueness” and my “inclinations” bowed before the cultural expectations of the “big P’s” in my life: parents, peers, professors, politicians, pundits, paycheck.


You recall the not-so-subtle message, don’t you?

Don’t stand out.

Stay in the middle of that bell curve.

Do as you’re told.

Keep your head down and enjoy a “getta” life: getta degree, getta job, getta spouse; getta house, 2.5 kids, fenced yard, 2 SUVs, and golden retriever; getta title, 401K, gold watch, and retirement cake.

Somewhere along that sorry path, inclinations got buried deeper and deeper into the depths of our accumulated, culturally-influenced neural connections.

Then, we bump up against that artificial finish line called 65, roll a stone and permanent seal over the tomb containing our withering inclinations, and call it retirement.


So, you’re tired and can’t wait for retirement because you bought the Koolaid that retirement is the relief you need from a life and “job” that, on a good day, injects an unhealthy dose of cortisol (hint: stress hormone) and has nothing to do with those inclinations you tormented your parents with at age 9 or 10.

So you bag it – or start planning to bag it – and wander into unchartered territory with a timeline that could be longer than the one spent in your “career.” Chances are good you may jump in armed with nothing resembling a roadmap.

Escape is the operative word. Not relaunch or take-off. Been there, done that, through with it.

And the accumulated skills and experience begin their retreat deep into secluded sections of the brain. The highly developed neural connections you formed over 10, 20, 30 years begin to shed their myelin and shrink, helped along with enchantment with the voice-activated remote, Netflix, and an average of 49 hours/week of TV watching.


You’ve just denied yourself the chance to become a “third age master.”

Our youngers, our off-kilter society need you to honor your “inclinations.” Yes, those inclinations are likely barnacled or crusted over by meeting cultural expectations, accumulating, conforming, fitting in. But, they ain’t dead yet. In fact, they are like the flowers that suddenly blanket Death Valley once a decade when perfect conditions develop.

Your “third age” could be that Death Valley flower experience. Conditions could be perfect for massaging those inclinations back to life. And making-a-ruckus in the world, or in somebody’s life.


Don’t waste your 10,000 hours!

It’s generally accepted that true masters have invested 10,000 hours in pursuing their inclinations. Tiger and Amadeus felt and acknowledged their inclinations at age 4 and were pushed into and nurtured along their journey to mastery by their fathers. They had their 10,000 hours as teenagers.

How many of 10,000 hours might you have that can be supplemented and channeled into bringing your inclinations to life?

You were anything but a slug through those career years. You accumulated skills and experiences that are worth a lot. Just think what might happen if you took those acquired skills, experiences, accumulated wisdom and turn it all loose on your “inclinations” with an eye toward making things better for you, the world, and the people in it.

Somehow that just seems to have a better ring to it than just escaping.

The Size of Your Funeral Gathering Will Be Determined By the Weather. Whaaaat?

Will I ever be relevant?

What is relevant?

Does anyone care that I’m here? (News flash: Most don’t!)

You would think that by 45 or 50 or 55 that we would have most things about life figured out. But, we don’t. We’ve been too busy being heads-down, meeting cultural expectations.

Maybe the timing of this speed bump is built into the male genetic arrangement. Women don’t seem to bother with it so much. More likely, it’s because we’ve pulled up short of the cultural goalposts expected at that age – image, title, boys toys, neighborhood, retirement account, etc.

And there is that sinking feeling that there isn’t enough time or enough gas left in the tank to catch up.

 


The hour-long funeral procession

Coming across this quote reminded me of an experience I had nine years ago. I was doing my recruiting thing ensconced in my 9th-floor office in a building that overlooked one of Denver’s busiest east-west thoroughfares. I was on the phone with a candidate when I heard the “woop-woop” of a police siren. I looked out my corner window and saw a group of motorcycle policemen blocking off intersections ahead of a funeral procession.

From my perch, I could see a couple of dozen cars behind the hearse winding around a curve a few blocks away. I thought nothing of it and turned back to my phone call which continued for another 15 minutes or so. As I hung up, I glanced again down to the street and saw the funeral procession continuing to steadily stream by with the trail of cars still disappearing around the curve.

I remember thinking that there must have been some dignitary that passed but I hadn’t heard or read of any.

I turned back to the paperwork on my desk and stood up a full 30 minutes later to discover the funeral procession still streaming by.

Over an hour passed before the last car and trailing motorcycle cop passed.

As far as I knew, the governor was still alive, as was the mayor. And I hadn’t heard of the passing of any mega-church pastors. Or any Broncos/Rockies/Nuggets/Avalanche sports heroes. Or any of our small collection of Colorado billionaires.

Who was this person?

I still don’t know. The obits revealed nothing out of the ordinary.


This much I know – –

It was a sunny, warm spring day. But good weather didn’t explain this procession. This person, whoever he or she was, had touched a lot of people in a positive way.

This had “silent hero” written all over it.

The event has stuck with me and is a constant reminder that it’s the “internal” and not the “external” and the “give” and not the “get” that ultimately counts.

That’s a hard part of this mid-life transition for many. It’s a point where some of the hardest career and life decisions are made. I’ve written before about the “happiness curve” and the research that has revealed that age 47, on average, is the low point of happiness for most men.


Having been there personally and listened to lots of stories from folks at this stage, I’ll offer up a few thoughts on what one should know or begin to discover at this phase of the life span.

  • You should know if your life quest is aligned with your core essence. By age 45 – 55, you should feel, at the gut level, that you are, or are not, doing what you were designed to do. For most of us, our decisions up to this point have been largely driven by cultural influences and not by recognition and acknowledgment of our deepest talents, strengths, and dreams. It’s important to take seriously those aforementioned questions that are starting to dog us. They are a sign that there may be a misalignment that, if not acted on, could carry us into a second-half full of discontent and the negative biological consequences that can accompany the discontent.
  • You are now on the “back nine” and don’t get to do the “front nine” over. I love the golf analogy. I borrowed it from pioneer exercise physiologist Dan Zeman (see this article) Dan is on a life quest to raise awareness amongst male boomers of the health and wellness impact of decisions made in the back-nine or second half of life, reminding us that we don’t get to play our front nine over. There is a good chance, as Americans, that our “front nine” didn’t do us any favors, physically and emotionally. More than likely, we have coupled the stress of striving to accumulate and meet cultural expectations with a relatively unhealthy lifestyle of poor diet and immobility in a quest for convenience, comfort, and conformity.

We don’t have to look far for proof of the significance of marginal “front nine” decisions. The “happiness curve” seems to confirm that the mid-40s is a point where “turning point” decisions need to be made as one heads into the “back nine.” It’s also a time when the accumulated effects of poor “front nine” lifestyle decisions begin to manifest in the form of health issues. Most of us enter our mid-40s in pretty good shape but beginning to demonstrate signs that a downturn is underway that needs attention. Most common are weight gain, hypertension, increased cholesterol, arthritis, anxiety/depression.

The CDC has announced that over 60% of American males are overweight and 25% are obese. Nearly 70% of the American population is pre-diabetic and 50% don’t know it. This age and later is when all this begins to show up. That alone is a call to action at this point in life.


A few other things come to mind that we should know if we don’t already:

  • Things are rarely as good or as bad as they seem. Most anxiety is self-inflicted.
  • Most of the things we worry about are out of our control. (Reference the Serenity Prayer as a guide).
  • Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery. The treasure is in today and doing what’s important to you. Today is all we have.
  • We will rise to the level of the five people we hang out with the most. It behooves us to be careful of our relationships and not be afraid to glean.
  • Our potential in life is limited not by the external but the internal. Live internally and accept that you are gifted in a special way. Don’t let our culture take it away from you.

It’s possible, as medicine and the biosciences continue to advance and we learn more about self-care, that 45-55 may not even be life’s true mid-point (more on this in a future article).  We can seize the opportunity and couple our inborn talents with accumulated life experiences, skills, and knowledge to virtually explode into your second half, be a world-changer, and have the time to do it.

The only thing holding us back is what we allow to happen between our temples.

Maybe the visual of that hour-long funeral procession will help.

You Are “Rare and Valuable” – Don’t Waste It By Retiring!

I’ve been pigging out recently on young, contrarian author and Georgetown University computer science professor, Cal Newport, rereading two of his books and watching lots of his many YouTube podcast interviews. The podcasts provide a welcome and productive relief of the boredom of my daily visits to the treadmill and upright bike.

I guess you could say I’m exercising a bit of “reverse generativity” and trying to be more of a “modern elder” by being willing to listen to and learn from someone less than half my age. Cal is only 38, looks 25, and talks like he’s been around forever, at least in the technology space.

As a late-stage septuagenarian, I’m not supposed to like millennials because they are so impudent, impatient, immature, uninformed.

Bad mantra! Bad idea!

Cal will bend your thinking in a very productive direction if you choose to engage and try but a few of his central messages.

Credibility? Yeah. He’s one of the youngest yet most published professors at Georgetown, has written six books, has a family, doesn’t have a social media account despite being in the technology business, doesn’t work past 5:30, and never works on the weekends. Oh, and finds time to respond to lots of requests for interviews.

Someone asked him in a podcast why he writes books and who they are for? I loved his response: “I write them for myself.” He builds them around what he wants his life to look like. What seems to fall out of his research and writing are some very powerful, insightful, and useful principles.


Passion versus Craftsman

In one of his earliest books, “So Good They Can’t Ignore You”, Newport takes an unpopular stand by advocating that pursuing your passion is bad career advice despite what nearly every self-help book and self-development guru would have us believe.

I’ll admit I’ve handed out that “bad advice” to a number of career coaching clients. Newport changed my thinking. He builds a very convincing, research-based argument that it is rarely passion that is the genesis of people becoming great but rather their commitment to developing “rare and valuable” skills and becoming “craftsman” through the accumulation of “career capital.”

It turns out that very few people begin careers in pursuit of their passion because (1) very few people even have a passion and (2) if they do, it is usually not related to work-life or career.

So how do people become “great?”

They get really good at something and the passion finds them.

They get so good, they can’t be ignored.

It’s Steve Jobs turning his back on being a Zen master and becoming so good at something that it produced one of the most world-changing events in history – the introduction of a music player that can make and receive phone calls.

It’s Steve Martin performing, experimenting, testing routines for 10 years in front of often-hostile audiences until he got so good that we couldn’t ignore him.


Retirement steals craftsmen.

I doubt that Steve Jobs would have retired had cancer not taken him early.

Steve Martin hasn’t shown any signs of stopping to delight us with his weirdness. Too much accumulated career capital; too many “rare and valuable” skills; too much of a “craftsman.”

Yet, thousands each year take their accumulated career capital, rare and valuable skills, and craftsman qualities and let them atrophy by buying into off-the-cliff traditional retirement.

Is that fair to a younger generation that could use the direction that years of accumulated wisdom can deliver?

Bigger yet, is it fair to the owner of that career capital and those rare and valuable skills to let them go to waste after investing thousands of hours acquiring them.

I realize that many, if not most, folks entering retirement are leaving a “job” – a way to pay the bills. They don’t acquire much career capital and no craftsman status. Some are leaving a career, the constant striving to increasingly better work not taking the time to stay put in a channel long enough to develop rare and valuable skills.

But, there are those who have pursued their work-life as a calling, an important part of their life, and a vital part of their identity. They’ve become true craftsmen.

Yet they let that identity fade away.

That can be an unfortunate consequence of succumbing to the traditional retirement mindset – career capital, deep craftsmanship, and rare and valuable skills relegated to the trash heap.


Enter – Capstone Career

Last week, I introduced the idea of a Capstone Career, a fitting way to celebrate craftsmanship, deep career capital, and those rare and valuable skills to preserve identity, stiff-arm boredom, maintain relevance, and maintain better health.

We can’t all be either of the aforementioned Steves, but we can still be “so good they can’t ignore us” in our own unique way – and make the world a better place during our post-career life.


Are you using your career capital in this second half or third age? What are your rare and valuable skills? Are they still vibrating – or getting stale?  What are you doing to maintain your craftsman status?

Share your stories with a comment below.

Is There a “Capstone Career” in Your Future?

My “9-to-5” these days is writing resumes, developing LinkedIn profiles and networking strategies, and providing career transition assistance for mid-to-late career professionals, mostly in the healthcare space.

I’m fortunate to be able to connect with some very committed and talented folks on a pretty deep level as I help them with these components of their “career marketing campaigns.”

It’s not unusual to slide into a conversation about the “R” word, as in:  “What are your thoughts about retirement?”

These folks usually have a time frame for the start of their retirement, either a specific year or a certain number of years beyond where they are now.

Not surprisingly, it almost always involves the number 65, reminding me of the strange entrenchment that number has in our collective psyche.

Even with a prospective date in mind, when asked what they expect to do with their retirement years or what retired life will look like for them, I invariably get the equivalent of a blank stare on the phone.

Few have a clue or have taken the time to think about it beyond the financial side – even though, for some, the decision is looming.


We’re stuck in 1935

I was reminded recently that “we created the clock and now it’s our master.” In the past, there was only the sun, moon, and stars and whatever creative notion about time that the priests and prophets came up with. Along the way, we came up with number boundaries with the 20th century producing 21 and 65 as the entry and exit points for participation in the adult world.

We get lots of guidance and advice and direction leading up to the first gateway. We drift out of the second gateway with little or no roadmap and a dearth of advice on what to do with the years that follow. We just know we need to do something resembling retirement at, or close to that number because that’s what “they” have been telling us now for 5-6 decades, keying off an irrelevant number established 86 years ago for political expediency.

A few decades ago when we typically only survived a handful of years beyond that second boundary, it wasn’t that big a deal. A commitment to a full-stop, leisure-based retirement made sense. But we screwed that up when we figured out how to live another 15-30 years beyond that.

We’ve technically invalidated the number 65 as a boundary but haven’t removed it from our heads.


Ignoring reality

If you ask these folks what concerns they may have about retirement beyond money, it typically will fall into one or more of these four categories:

  1. Boredom.
  2. Loss of identity.
  3. Becoming irrelevant.
  4. Deteriorating health

Yet, having identified their concerns, few have considered a plan designed to address them – all of which are addressable.

I’m committed to doing something about that.


How about a “Capstone Career?”

Mike Drak is a friend of mine,  a self-proclaimed “retirement rebel” and author of two really good books on the topic of retirement: “Victory Lap Retirement: Work While You Play, Play While You Work” and “Retirement Heaven or Hell: Which Will You Choose. Nine Principles for Designing Your Ideal Post-Career Lifestyle.”  I regret that Mike thought of “Victory Lap” first because it describes a great mindset for a post-career life.

I’ve been brainstorming for an equivalent term and came up with “Capstone Career”, with help from executive career coach, Helen Harkness, founder of Career Design Associates, who introduces the concept in her book “Don’t Stop the Career Clock: Rejecting the Myths of Aging for a New Way to Work in the 21st Century.”

I think a “Capstone Career” is a great solution to the aforementioned retirement concerns.

Why “capstone?”  What is it?

Capstone has a couple of definitions:

  1. a stone fixed on top of something, typically a wall.
  2. the high point; a crowning achievement; a culminating experience.

Much like Drak’s “Victory Lap”, a Capstone Career could be that “crowning achievement and culminating experience” that celebrates the bringing together of dormant dreams, resurrected talents, accumulated skills, and experiences to create a life-enhancing, purposeful antidote to the hidden pitfalls of full-stop retirement.

Helen Harkness puts it this way:

“We can do this by concentrating on functional age – ignoring chronology and learning a new way to tell time, re-careering and rethinking retirement, moving from career crisis to career quest, creating and activating what I call a capstone career. By knowing what we want and doing what we love, we can continue life’s journey with creativity, wisdom, power, and purpose.”


Landing strip or launch pad?

Our culture says it’s time to land.

Our biology encourages a re-launch.

I’ll risk sounding like a broken record with the reminder that our biology offers us only two choices: growth or decay. Doesn’t 65 sound a bit like a decay-producing landing point or “use-by” stamp. It certainly has never carried the suggestion of a re-launch.

It’s interesting to note a 2018 report by the New England Journal of Medicine that found the most productive age in a human’s life is – drum roll, please – between the ages of 60 and 70.

It gets better. the second most productive age is between 70 and 80 and the third most productive decade is 50-60.

The “u-curve of happiness” study done by author Jonathan Rauch revealed that our happiness track hits bottom at around 47 and rises to its peak in the 70s and 80s.

Who knew?


I don’t need no stinkin’ job!

I get it – we can’t seem to rebrand “work” as anything other than a negative four-letter word. For the vast majority of us, work represents something that is a mismatch to our deepest skill set that we don’t truly enjoy and tolerate and endure for the money. We long to get away from it and do – what? Anything but work. Beyond that, the definition for most is fuzzy at best.

You aren’t going to be told by your financial planner or your government the truth that work is pivotal to achieving a longer, healthier life. We are encouraged to move to the wrong side of the biological ledger, become consumers rather than producers, and wind down at a time that the combination of our talent, wisdom, skills, and experiences may be at a peak. That puts us on the down-slope and accelerates the “live too short and die too long” model that characterizes the majority of our retired population.

A capstone Career is not a job. It’s a response to a “calling” or satisfaction of a “quest.” It doesn’t even need to be designed to make money although it can be. Above all it combines three simple principles:

  1. Doing what you really, really want to do.
  2. Doing what you are really, really good at.
  3. Providing something the world needs.

 

 

 

Making money at it may be necessary for some. But the heart of a Capstone Career is to retain or recover relevance, to avoid boredom, re-establish identity, and to place oneself on a track that avoids the deterioration of health that accompanies a purposeless retired life.


Stay tuned. More to come on this topic. Share your thoughts on this concept with a comment. We value your input.

Will Your Retirement Make You a Victim of Newton’s First Law of Motion?

What are the chances that your Certified Financial Planner would have learned about Newton’s First Law of Motion in insurance sales school?  You know, the Law that says ” -an object at rest remains at rest and an object in motion remains in motion with the same velocity unless acted upon by an unbalancing force.”

Do you suppose that any financial advisor has thought of himself or herself as an “unbalancing force?”

One could argue the case, I suppose, considering that so much of what a good financial planner does is help people put the brakes on.

“Here, let’s work on this plan so we can get you from doing 110 mph down to near zero. It’s the ‘natural’ thing to do because that’s what they taught me in life insurance school. Plus, you’ve earned it. You’ve worked hard and are entitled to fade away.”


OK – a bit melodramatic, I know – and I just pissed off the entirety of one of the largest components of the massive financial services industry.

But, isn’t there a modicum of truth in there somewhere?

Don’t we innocently buy into an unnatural concept that says it’s a logical and pre-destined thing to put the brakes on the body and mind at a certain (and equally illogical) age?

“OK, look, you’re almost 65. You know, it’s time to accept the fact that you’re starting to crumble and for you to start building safeguards against that, like a safe and comfortable retirement community where you can crumble together with other similarly brainwashed ‘seniors’.”


I’ve been sleeping with my “financial adviser” for 50 years and 2 months now. She avoids dropping the “R-word” into a conversation because (1) she knows where my short fuses are and (2) she doesn’t buy the concept either. Too much kid and grandkid work to do; too much connecting-with-siblings to do; too many Jack Reacher and C.J. Box novels to read; too big a fight for traditional values left to do; too many friendships that need massaging and deepening.

No kicking her to the curb! Or the park bench! (She’s zumba-ing in the kitchen as I write this).

I like to think it’s been my tremendous influence on her but, truth be known, submissive is not in her vocabulary.

I do believe, though, that enduring the sudden death of her 67-year-old father only ten months into his retirement after 46 years with one company left an indelible impression. Here one day, gone the next with no hint of physical problems. After 46 years of motion, an “unbalancing force” called retirement, wrapped nicely in a send-off dinner and a gold watch (seriously!), sent him home to become something he’d never been and wasn’t prepared to become – unchallenged, unstructured, unplanned.


Mo’ doesn’t need to leave the house!

Are we starting to rewrite some chapters in the life manual? Like the ones about how nirvana exists on the other side of 65 with the opportunity to wind down, come in for a landing, turn off the mind, and luxuriate in self-indulgence.

We can only hope we’re doing some serious editing.

I believe we are.

Momentum in life doesn’t have to – and shouldn’t – stop because a politician, big business, and union officials carved out an artificial finish line 86 years ago for purely political purposes with no humanitarian intent. Unfortunately, that act spawned an industry that has been incredibly successful for over five decades convincing us to do something that is unnatural and, ultimately, unhealthy.

It’s not realistic to expect a financial planner to fully understand or be inspired to explain that moving toward zero momentum is a violation of our very biology with its bilateral option of growth or decay. Folks, they are salespeople!  Can we really expect them to have an understanding of our cellular composition and the impact of their guidance on the same?

However, I do sense that there are financial planners becoming more sensitive to the “soft skill” sides of retirement and including more dialog about planning beyond just the numbers. In fact, Mitch Anthony, financial planning consultant and author of the excellent book entitled “The New Retirementality” has launched a program entitled “Life Centered Financial Planning” with the goal of equipping financial planning firms with tools to better address nonfinancial retirement challenges – or, as he calls them “the realistic, existential risks of retirement that humans must wrestle with.”

Part of his message to planners is to raise their sensitivity to the fact that “more and more people are coming to the same conclusion – it works to work. Working doesn’t have to mean all-in, but instead as needed to meet emotional, social, and intellectual stimulation needs.”

That’s a message I hope you may be hearing from your planner if you are working with one. If you aren’t working with one but plan to (P.S. you definitely should), watch for an attitude that goes beyond the charts and graphs and shows respect for the physical, social, mental, psychological, spiritual side of retirement.


Respect the law

Newton’s first law is often called the Law of Inertia. That’s pretty close to the true definition of retirement which is derived from the French verb “retirer” meaning to “retreat, withdraw, seek a place of safety and security.”

We weren’t meant to be “objects at rest.” In fact, we are designed for the opposite, regardless of age.

Don’t let anybody convince you otherwise.


Thanks for reading. If you have some thoughts on this topic, share them below with a comment. And tell your friends about our weekly articles at www.makeagingwork.com– there’s still lots of room on the mailing list.

 

 

 

A New Model for Aging: Subtract 20 Years From Your Chronological Age.

I pulled another book at random off my “A” shelf this week as I wait for Amazon to deliver my latest new book purchase. It turns out the book’s kind of an oldie, published in 1999. As I began my reread, I quickly realized why it was on the “A” shelf even with that publication date. It sat ignored since my first reading in 2013.

It’s worth a second read for me, chock full of timeless wisdom and still-current advice on making something of the second-half of life.

It’s entitled “Don’t Stop the Career Clock: Rejecting the Myths of Aging for a New Way to Work in the 21st Century” and the author is Helen Harkness, founder and CEO of an executive coaching company in Dallas called Career Design Associates.

harkness_allen_lib

I recall placing a call to Helen after reading her three books because I was so impressed with the process she had developed to help executives successfully find their “capstone career” in their second half.

I believe Helen was 81 or 82 when I spoke with her in 2013.

She’s still at it.

Do the math.

Shouldn’t she be doing something other than – gasp! – working?


Ms. Harkness, as you might expect, has some strong feelings about attitudes toward aging. In the late-1990’s, she was at the front of the parade calling for us to “break the mindset that chronological age, the age on your birth certificate, is your real age.”

Twenty-plus years ago, she took to task our bent toward using the calendar to determine our age, saying:

“In contemporary urban society, we have the notion that a precise chronological age marks the transition from one stage of life to another, which is highly questionable. Today, the chronological ages of twenty-one and sixty-five define the lower and the upper boundaries of participation in the adult world, as well as the cultural definition of full humanity. Unfortunately, as it is today, those over sixty-five have no defined active roles in our society. So what are we to do with our highly extended long life.”

“This is an outdated but strongly established system that maintains tight control over our destiny. Yet there is absolutely no expert on aging today who holds that chronological age is a preferred or valid way to determe our actual age.”

Ahead of her time, Harkness was suggesting then that, with our advances in nutrition, fitness, medical services, and scientific breakthroughs, we should expect mid-life to start at sixty, not forty.


We’re still stuck – –

-with a chronological mindset. We’re trending away from it but at a snail’s pace.

Because of our “- social and cultural expectations, we program ourselves to begin to fall apart at a certain designated age, and we oblige.”

We are still dogged by this irrational concept of full-stop retirement as something obligatory and entitled, refusing to acknowledge that the chronological component of age 65 spawned 85 years ago wasn’t relevant then and is totally irrelevant today. And, history is showing us that this outdated concept can put us at the top of a downward slope and accelerate the slide.

Yet, it persists.

Can we perhaps admit that with our average lifespan now beginning to recede and the average American living with over 10 years of multiple, debilitating chronic illnesses that it’s well past time to consider a new “aging model?”


What if – –

-you subtracted 20 years from your current chronological age? Knowing what you know about yourself and the world around you, what would you do? Harkness suggests that if you know what you would do, then go do it now, adding: “Move on with your life. Take action. Forget who or what you are supposed to be because you are a certain chronological age.”

I believe it was Satchel Paige, Major and Negro League Baseball pitcher, who asked: “How old would you be if you didn’t know how old you are?

Many of us remain frozen in our thinking about what we want this extended period of lifespan to look like without realizing that our chronological age is unconsciously and automatically blocking our thinking about our future.

Harkness goes further to say (bolding is mine):

“We grow old, not by living a certain number of chronological years, but by becoming idle in mind, body, and purpose. We decline and decay by abandoning our flexibility, our ideals, our talents, our life’s mission, and our involvement in our community. We grow old and retire by buying into society’s story that we can be surplussed, junked, and discarded. The most deadly assumptions related to aging are that retirement and old age are directly connected to the chronological age of sixty-five, that mental decline begins at age twenty-one, and that senility is inevitable if we live a long time.”

What do we have left if we abandon our chronological age?

Functional age, which Harkness describes as combining and integrating biological, social, and psychological measures into one active package and the answer to shaking ourselves loose from our fear of aging.

Next time someone asks you your age, ask them “Do you want my functional or chronological?”  I assure you, it gets some interesting responses.


The “live long, die fast” model for aging:

You may know by now that I’m an advocate for all of us  “dying young, as late as possible.” Harkness calls it “living long and dying fast” and she created her own aging model.

I’m adopting it.

Here it is:

  • Young adulthood: 20-40
  • First midlife: 40-60
  • Second midlife: 60-80
  • Young old: 80-90
  • Elderly: 90 and above
  • Old-old: 2-3 years to live

At 78, I like the sound and feel of still being in my second mid-life. It feels right since I’m finding a surprising reserve in the old gas tank.

I also like the brevity of the “old-old and 2-3 years to live”  except that I favor 2-3 minutes instead of years.

I still envision going face down in a trout stream having just fooled a 20″ rainbow. At somewhere around 110.

I may have to rent a walker one of these days and see how it would work in a river.


Does this aging model resonate? What are your thoughts? Leave a comment below or email me at www.makeagingwork.com.

Stay safe. We’re getting our vaccinations tonite at 7:30! Yay – maybe a taste of normalcy around the bend.

Do You Have an Exit Strategy Built Into Your Retirement Plan?

Exit strategy from your retirement?

No, I’m not talking about prepaid funeral expenses/burial plots or DNR/power-of-attorney stuff.

I’m talking about a retirement strategy that includes a contingency plan should (when) the euphoria of a leap from labor-to-leisure fades and one finds themselves wading into the hidden perils of a self-indulgent, leisure-based retirement.

OK, I understand the raised eyebrows. I don’t imagine this was ever a part of the conversations that took place with your financial planner – that is if you were one of the 25% of retirees who have chosen to work with a planner.

Can you imagine the customer retention rate of a financial planner that says: “OK, now that we have your plan laid out, let’s talk about what you would like to do when you discover that this traditional off-the-cliff retirement thing is for the birds.”

Why would I need to have an exit plan from something that is supposedly the apex of a life-well-lived?

Relaxation. Fun. Sleep. Rinse. Repeat.

Feels so, so good – easy to get used to and to become habitual.

Hard to exit.


A couple of weeks ago I wrote about the dangers of “the dip”, that early phase of retirement, how easy it is to get stuck there, and how retirement can be like a cul-de-sac – circular, safe, comfortable, dead end.

An exit strategy is a good thing to have for “the dip.”

In 2018, I did an article about the stages of retirement (see it here) where I referenced the research done by Ken Dychtwald, the founder of AgeWave and the foremost thought leader on issues related to aging.  His organization has done extensive research on retirement, using a database of over 50,000 retirees.  They concluded that retirement has five stages:

  1. Imagination – 5-15 years before retirement

  2. Anticipation – 5 years before retirement

  3. Liberation – retirement day, anticipation realized. Average duration: one year

  4. Re-orientation – 1-15 years after retirement. Critical life questions surface; post-partem depression is common; growing concerns about health and finances; boredom; unstimulated

  5. Reconciliation – late 70-80s; trying to come to terms with who they really are; friends and family dying; money concerns intensify; concerns about legacy

Number 3 is the entrance to “the dip.” If you knew the downsides of staying in #3, wouldn’t an exit plan of some sort be sensible to avoid #4 and #5?


Mikey likes it!!

Mike Drak is a budding new author that exercised an exit strategy from a retirement gone sour. Mike got his walking papers unexpectedly after 36 years in the banking industry, with much of it in upper management roles. After working hard throughout his career, saving for and anticipating his retirement, his experience was nothing like he expected it to be when it came around.

In his words, “- I felt lost, aimless, well on the way to spiraling down into Retirement Hell.”

Mike’s exit strategy was to write and to help others avoid what he experienced. His first book, “Victory Lap Retirement: Work While You Play. Play While You Work” has been a big success.

Mike treated me to an advance copy of his second book entitled Retirement Heaven or Hell: Which Will You Choose? 9 Principles for Designing Your Ideal Post-Career Lifestyle.”  It’s a solid guide for retirees who are experiencing the disenchantment of traditional retirement.  Better yet, it’s a guide for those anticipating retirement to avoid what can become “retirement hell.”

Mike’s story of entering “retirement hell” will resonate for some who have entered retirement without a carefully thought-out non-financial plan  – which is the case for 2 out of 3 retirees – with no plan for exiting “the dip.”

I’ll wrap with a paragraph from Mike’s book:

“This book contains everything I’ve learned about retirement and how we can live longer, healthier, happier lives. It’s a  book about possibility, finding purpose, and having fun in retirement. I felt the need to write it because the conventional retirement story they like to tell us no longer works today. It’s a big mistake to live a retirement devoid of accomplishment, success, and failures. We were not born to merely survive and then retire, full stop. Once we’ve left our primary career behind, we need to continue to matter, to make a difference, to contribute, to help the world be a better place. And believe me, the world needs a lot of help right now.” 


Did you have a retirement exit plan that you’d be willing to share? We’d love your thoughts or comments on this. Scroll down and leave us a note. Also, tell your friends about this weekly publication and suggest they join the growing tribe at www.makeagingwork.com.  There’s a free 25-page ebook on how to live longer and healthier in it for them.