Growing old or getting old? They’re two different things and you have a choice.

We are all going to grow old – that is inevitable and immutable.

Life is a fatal disease. Once contracted, there is no known cure.

Time marches on.


Getting old, on the other hand, is optional.

That’s between the temples. How we grow old is largely up to us and starts with attitude.

I’ll bet you know a 50-year-old that’s going on 80. And an 80-year-old going on 50.

The difference?

Sorry, you’re wrong if you said genetics. Genetics may determine 20–30% of our longevity at most. Attitude can affect longevity and determines 100% of how we view aging.

Recent research has revealed that people who have a positive attitude about aging live an average of 7 years longer than those who don’t.

We westerners have a fixation on numbers, especially in the U.S. where we seem unwilling/unable to release the number 65 from our thinking as a turning point to the downside slope of our lives.

We couple that with the non-sensical concept of retirement and accelerate the growing old and then die short of our biology’s true longevity potential.

We know there is no biological reason that any of us shouldn’t live to 100 or beyond. But we continue to pull up severely short of that benchmark.


In my experience, the mere mention of living that long amongst my age cohort (80) invites plenty of scorn and invective. Most are repulsed by the idea, failing to acknowledge that we’re designed to last at least that long. We should if we viewed our later years differently and dispensed with the cultural influences that help us accelerate the decline that most people experience in the second half of life.

My 80-year-old body, while in much better shape than even most 60-year-olds, still confirms that the immutable is moving forward. I am growing old and will, just like you, eventually die.

But I’m choosing not to get old despite the external evidence that it is happening, albeit at a slower accelerating pace than for most of my cohort.

I’m striving to give my body and mind what they need to come as close as possible to the 122-year benchmark for longevity set for us by a lady in Paris, France in 1997.

I don’t expect to get there because there is likely too much early life (pre-40) damage done to overcome to make that happen. But, I expect to come closer than most by setting a 100+ year goal than if I just chose to accept average.

I’m already ahead since I just turned 80 and the average lifespan for an American male is around 75 (and declining).


Two things that will help me get closer to that benchmark:

  1. Gratitude: as crazy as it sounds, I’m grateful that I will die because it means I lived when many are never given the chance. I have the gift of life.
  2. I stopped time-traveling into the past and the future and accept that I only have today. One of my antidotes to growing old is to attitudinally live in the present moment and avoid the worry, regrets, and fears that lie in the past and future.

I have no illusions about the fact that it could all be over tomorrow.

Right now, I have this moment.

Aging: When You Have More to Give and Less to Lose.

Dear reader, if you’ve been hanging with me for a while, you know I’m in total denial.

Yep, still deluding myself into thinking that living to 112 1/2 years makes sense.

As my chronology has moved into my 9th decade, some of my physiology doesn’t seem to have signed on for the trip. Or, at least it’s hinting that it’s gonna be a tough trip.

As you read this, I’m sitting in a recliner coming down from a Bier Block anesthesia of my left arm so a hand surgeon could remove the joint at the base of my thumb and somehow jury rig it so that in 12 weeks I can start playing guitar again and in 4 months grip a golf club again.

You can tell I’m thrilled.

Apparently, it’s a common procedure for my age cohort. Things do wear out.

Ever try functioning with only one thumb?  Some things won’t be going that well for the next few months.


The thumb isn’t alone!

In the meantime, some other parts are sending off signals that they may not be signing on for the cruise to super-centenarianism.

Left shoulder, left hip, left foot, left wrist. Don’t ask me to explain – maybe it’s because I voted for Trump (regretfully).

Regardless, the last couple of months have, more than any other time, reminded me that being an older person trying to impersonate a younger person isn’t fooling anybody, least of all my body parts.

Oh, I’m not abandoning denial. I find a strange comfort there. I’ll keep thinking about staying young and not growing old. And I’ll keep the repair thing going until the universe decides it’s time to take all those well-worn and recycled parts back.

Part of the fuel for the denial is the perhaps delusional feeling that what I do – and intend to do until the universe makes that call – brings value to somebody, somewhere, somehow.


Taking the sting out of old age.

Eric Weiner is an author and self-described “Philosophical Traveler and Recovering Malcontent” who writes on Medium.com. A few things in one of his recent posts (see it here) made me stop and think. For one:

“Old age is not a disease. It is not a pathology. It is not abnormal. It is not a problem. Old age is a continuum, and everyone is on it. We’re all aging all the time. You are aging right now as you read these words — and not any faster or slower than an infant or a grandfather.

As our future shrinks, other futures grow. Our unfinished business will be finished by others. This thought, perhaps more than any other, takes the sting out of old age.”

People like Mr. Weiner, with their apparent intellect and deep, critical thinking, tend to send me hurtling into that nomadic desert wandering in circles in what is my ADHD-infested mind.

I found myself thinking of how little what I do means much, in the general scope of eternity and life on this mudball.

That kinda stings.

Until I thought about what Weiner says about unfinished business being finished by others. As my future shrinks, other futures grow – and my business may be carried forward by others.

That sets a new bar for me.

Get on it, bucko – and stop wasting time!! Somebody will pick up the pieces. Just go break some things.


Somehow, I tied his thought to retirement (see desert reference above).

Surprise, surprise! Since I seem to have this thing about what this unnatural, illogical concept has become in our lives.

It struck me how so many traditional retirees end up in a swamp made up of boredom, irrelevance, isolation, and declining health. It occurred to me that retirement does become sort of the “ultimate casualty” for many as they stop the business of doing business that can be finished by others.

Doesn’t full-stop retirement stop that train of building on something bigger than oneself? Something that can be carried on?

Doesn’t self-indulgent consumerism keep us from having a chance to fulfill why we are placed on this planet?

I’m reminded of a speech that distinguished educator and author Dr. Mortimer Adler delivered to an insurance Million Dollar Roundtable of the National Association of Underwriters on the Queen Mary in 1962 (bolding is mine):

“The retirement age is coming down from 70, to 65, to 60 and may, in the course of the next 25 years, go below that.

But the dream come true is a nightmare.

For retirement, conceived as a protracted vacation, is a form of prolonged suicide. It marks the first formal stage on the road to oblivion.

Consider the loss to society and deprivation of the individual involved when a man in the real prime of life, the mental, moral, and spiritual prime, is turned out to pasture at the decree of the calendar – someone who has the most creative and most socially useful part of his labor still in him

Here is greatness wasted on the putting greens of Long Beach or the green benches of St. Petersburg.

What is the solution, or is there a solution?

Just – work. Work, not to insure your retirement, but to prevent it! You will benefit greatly from any kind of work which is a challenge to that part of you which continues growing.

It is finally time to distill wisdom from experience and to give of that wisdom.”


The protagonist in Weiner’s article is a French woman, Simone de Beauvoir, the French novelist, philosopher, and feminist hero. She once said:

“There is only one solution if old age is not to be an absurd parody of our former life and that is to go on pursuing ends that give our existence meaning — devotion to individuals, to groups or to causes, social, political, intellectual or creative work.”


Let’s trade in the 20th-century relic that we’ve succumbed to –

Learn – Earn – Retire – Die

for –

Learn – Earn – Return


Any thoughts on this? We’d love your feedback. Drop us an email at gary@makeagingwork.com or leave a comment below.

How would you describe your last 80 years in this world? Some advice for 40+ year olds (and maybe some other 80-year olds).

I penned this article 20 months ago on Quora.com before number 80 happened.  There’s been about 90,000 “Mikeys” that have liked it so far and since today is, in fact, my 80th birthday, I felt it appropriate to tune it up and share it with this tribe.

I think 80 years earns the right to provide some insight. So here goes.


For starters, my first 80 years are exactly like yours in one respect. It has been an ongoing series of choices and continues to be. I am where and what I am as the result of the accumulated choices I have made over the course of my life. And it will end up based on the choices I make going forward.

I’ve been fortunate to have started life without any “blueprint errors” so I wasn’t encumbered with any physical or mental limitations. Nor did I have a “silver spoon” growing up.

I guess you could say my life has been a low-drama adventure – probably like most lives. Lots of twists and turns mixing tranquility with chaos and considerable unpredictability with more than my share of attempts to control the uncontrollable.

I’m an escapee from rural Wyoming and a town of 800 with a high-school graduating class of 12. I’ve spent more time steering a Farmall tractor in circles, snuck into more drive-in theaters, raided more gardens, killed more rabbits for spending money, and driven more cars that didn’t have turn-signals and seat belts than most.

Pine Bluffs, Wyoming – in all its glory!!

My college experience was stretched over nine years and three different majors, all paid for on my own by working 2–3 jobs. My wife of 51 years liked the way I served her food as a hasher at her sorority house and that I was an entertainer/guitar player on the weekends, that I wore sport coats to class, and didn’t buy the phony frat boy bit.

Oh, and the ’65 Chevy Malibu SuperSport, 300hp, four-on-the-floor helped a little.

So I fooled her into a marriage fully aware that I was marrying way over my head.

Our early married life experienced a hiccup – our first son was born severely brain-damaged from an undetermined pre-natal event and succumbed 16 months later, 11 days before our daughter was born.

It was a major factor in helping us both build resilience that sustains us today.

I forged ahead doing the “getta” thing: getta degree, getta job, getta wife, getta mortgage, getta fenced- yard, getta family, 2.5 kids and golden retriever, getta mini-van, getta title, getta 401K.

I was a poster boy for chasing the “linear life plan” i.e. the 20–40–20  life-cycle model that most still succumb to – 20 years of education, 40 years of work building someone else’s dream followed by 20 years (hopefully) of “nirvana” called retirement.

Some refer to it as the “learn-earn-retire-die” model. 

I had begun to question the concept of retirement in my 40s as I immersed myself more in the self-development world where I discovered that retirement was never a consideration for most high-achievers. It appeared to me that most of the longest-living humans remained in the creative process rather than retire – a word derived from the French verb “retirer” which means “withdraw.”

So, I’ve chosen not to retire but to remain in the “creative process” as long as I can. I’ve set the goal of living to 112 1/2 knowing that my chances of getting there are pretty slim because of early marginal health habits. But I know that by setting the goal I have a much better chance of getting there than if I just settle for living out the average lifespan of the American male which is somewhere around 78 and declining.

See – I’ve beaten it already!

I left the 20–40–20 track at age 60 and started my own business as an executive recruiter after 32 years of wandering through the desert of corporate employment. I learned, by starting a business that I knew nothing about and was under-prepared to start, that I’m not the entrepreneur I thought I would be and that it’s not the glamorous world people think it is.

The last 20 years have been the most challenging, enlightening, and gratifying part of the 80-year journey and the part of the journey from which I can draw advice worthy of consideration for a 40-year old.

Here are the cliff notes from the last 20 years:

  • I moved from near millionaire status on paper to an embarrassing fraction of that following three market crashes and draw-down to support my business.
  • Son and daughter launched, rewarded with three wonderful grandkids.
  • Late-life discovery of my core strengths and realization that my 32 years invested in corporate life was a mismatch with my true talents.
  • Acknowledged a talent and drive to help people struggling with major life decisions, especially those at or beyond mid-life.
  • Became a dedicated student of understanding how our minds and bodies work; read over 900 books on self-development, health and wellness, brain development, positive psychology.
  • Resurrected a latent talent as a writer and chose to finish out by putting that skill to work along with my ability to help guide others to better mid-life decisions.

So life today is a mash-up of recovery from mistakes, acknowledgment of innate ability, some victories, and a modicum of acquired wisdom from all of the above. I can honestly say that I experience “eudaimonic happiness” (see this article) and am at the happiest and healthiest point in my life having been able to apply some of the voluminous knowledge and experiences that I have accumulated through my life.


How would I advise a 40-year old?

Let’s think in big buckets – the buckets that are foundational to success, health, longevity, and purpose in life.

Bucket #1: Get serious about and take control of your health. Nothing counts for anything if you don’t feel good. As Americans, we do a pretty shitty job of protecting our health. Candidly, we are surprisingly illiterate when it comes to understanding how our minds and bodies work.

If we did understand, would

  • we take 35% of our meals through the side window of our cars?
  • we weigh 20 lbs more on average today than in 1980 without being any taller?
  • 50% of our population today be pre-diabetic with 70% of those not knowing it (CDC report)?
  • would our longevity curve be receding instead of continuing to progress?

We know there is no biological reason that we shouldn’t live to 100 or beyond. Our “whole-life benchmark” has already been set at 122 years, 164 days because Jeanne Calment of Paris made it that far. So we know the body can last that long. Yet, on average, in America, we achieve only 66% of that potential.

Why the gap? In a word: lifestyle. The five major killers in our culture – heart disease, cancer, stroke, diabetes, and dementia – have not changed in decades. They are lifestyle diseases and all are preventable.

Our poor diets, sedentary living, and increasing isolation are killing us early – we continue to “live too short and die too long” with late life for many composed of extended morbidity and early frailty.

Become a student of your mind and body and start now to understand how your body works at the cellular level. With that awareness, you will be able to put in place a lifestyle of good health-inducing habits that will bode well for a mid-life and beyond that is energetic, long, and meaningful.

It’s also important to remember that we, in America, are encumbered with a healthcare system that is broken and not exactly an ally in this quest. It operates on the principle of “cure” and not “prevention.” It’s a disease-care system that is trained to “drug it or cut it out” and “mop up the water without turning off the spigot.” It is reactive, not proactive. It’s up to you to be proactive and take charge of your health and partner with your physician and not let him/her be the arbiter of your health.

One of the best pieces of advice I can pass on is to encourage you to read what many consider one of the most transformational books ever written when it comes to achieving good health. It’s called “Younger Next Year”, co-authored by Chris Crowley and Dr. Henry Lodge. It’s a book that has impacted many lives. In fact, Bill Gates, who has read a book a week forever, considers it one of the most impactful books he’s ever read.

Applying what this book can teach you, your life curve can look more like this:

Bucket #2:

Discover your strengths and be the author of your life. Chances are high that you came through your formal education without fully understanding what your deepest strengths and talents are. You were plopped into a classroom with 30 other “victims” and forced to learn what an outdated educational system continues to say is best for you – so that you can fit into and conform to the aforementioned 20–40–20 learn-earn-retire model that still prevails. It’s likely you have gotten this far having not chosen the base materials of who you really are.

We all have within us an “essence”, or what German psychiatrist Carlo Strenger calls our “thus and no other”, a something born in each of us that is “recalcitrant to change.” It’s that inner dream that gets tamped down and barnacled over by the educational system, the advice of the influential “P’s” in your life (parents, peers, professors, politicians, and pundits), much of corporate employment, and the pressure to conform.

I know of what I speak. Although successful by cultural standards of title, status, and income while in the corporate world, it wasn’t until I was in my sixties that I finally acknowledged that I was operating outside of my “base materials” or “core strengths and talents.” I ignored or refused to accept the feedback that I got from several personality- and strengths-assessment tests that I took – because they didn’t align with my belief of what the culture expected. The tests said, in every case, that I should be in a learning-teaching environment where my natural, but undeveloped, ability to write and speak could flourish.

I began to move in that direction in my mid-sixties and the journey continues.

So, if you haven’t, start now to identify and acknowledge your strengths, how you are wired up, what your “thus and no other” is, and move toward it. It’s not too late to be the true author of your life. As NPR journalist and author of “Life Reimagined: Ths Science, Art, and Opportunity of Midlife” Barbara Bradley Hagerty states:

“- change within the boundaries of your natural talents, proclivities, personality traits, and skills.”

Invest in, and take seriously, assessments such as Strengthsfinder, Enneagram, Myers-Briggs, DISC. Work with a career coach or life coach.

Ask yourself a couple of questions: (1) Would I continue doing what I am doing for no pay? (2) If time and money were not a factor, what would I be doing?

At forty, you are a mid-career professional or close to it. You’ve lived enough years and have enough of a biography of successes and failures that you should know enough about what you excel at, what you don’t do well, what energizes you, and what you dread. All this can guide you to this next stage.

Bucket #3:

Dispose of the retirement mindset. My position on this is, admittedly, controversial. Over the last 5–6 decades, the concept of a “labor-to-leisure”, “vocation-to-vacation” retirement has become so entrenched in the psyche of the western world that to assault it is heresy. But assault it I will – with several things that a 40-year old should consider as they move into the second half of life.

Here are a few simple facts about retirement as we’ve come to know it:

  • Retirement is an unnatural act that doesn’t exist in nature and didn’t exist anywhere on the planet 150 years ago. Have you ever seen a retired coyote or maple tree? This unnatural act started in Europe in the late 1800s by Otto Von Bismark for purely political reasons and was picked up by FDR in the U.S. a half-century later, again for political reasons. The arbitrary selection of 65 as a retirement age (at a time when the average lifespan was 62) established an artificial line that was irrelevant then and even more irrelevant now.
  • The statistics behind traditional retirement are not encouraging. IBM determined a couple of generations ago that the average number of pension checks issued was 24. Our Social Security system, in 1995, determined that the average number of social security checks issued was 29. Shell Oil studied thousands of its employees and found that retiring at 55 doubled the risk for death before reaching 65 compared to those who worked beyond age 65. Depression, suicide, and divorce rates are higher amongst retirees than non-retirees.
  • With our frontal cortex capability, we have dreamed up a concept that goes against our biology. We have one of two biological choices – grow or decay. It’s in our cellular structure. Traditional retirement draws us to sedentary living, withdrawal from work, increased social isolation, and reduced learning – all things that go against the way we are wired up biologically i.e. our body’s “grow or decay” mechanism. That’s all we need to know to explain why we still “live too short and die too long” in our society when, in fact, we should “live long and die short” or “die young, as late as possible” as stated earlier.

Bucket #4:

Own your career and never stop learning. Continue to refine and deepen your skills within and outside of your career path.

Repeatedly, I have worked with folks in the late 40s or 50s who have struggled to re-enter the job market after being blindsided by a layoff or other type of termination. Often it’s due to the fact that they have made no attempt to continue to enhance or learn new skills throughout their career.

Many of these hapless victims clung to the 20th-century illusion that their company has their interests at heart and will nurture them along. This is a dangerous thought pattern.

Don’t be fooled into thinking that your employer has your interests at heart. They don’t. They are always guarding their own self-interests.

Master Certified Career Coach, Janine Moon, in her book “Career Ownership” emphasizes the importance of career ownership in the face of both the magnitude and the accelerating pace of change occurring in our global economy.

Here are a few “wise” questions that she suggests a 40-year old should be asking themselves:

  • When did you last do serious research to educate yourself about the future of your industry and the skills needed to succeed in this changing marketplace?
  • When did you last assess your skills, abilities, and goals to determine how you could get the most satisfaction out of the workspace in which you spend many of your waking hours.?
  • When did you last write out your 3-year career plan (on your own) along with your 12-month learning plan?
  • When did you last devote personal time and funds to upgrade your own skills?
  • When did you last consider requesting a job rotation that would help you build a relationship and impact your marketability inside or outside of your organization?
  • When did you last review and align yourself with your organization’s top two strategic growth areas?
  • When did you last identify a weak area in your skills or performance and take personal responsibility to address the problem?

As Americans, we don’t have a good track record as continuous learners. For instance:

  • Approximately 39% of high school never read another book after graduation.
  • Approximately 42% of college graduates never read another book after graduation.
  • 95% of books read in the U.S. are read by 5% of the population.

Read, read, read. It’s key to avoiding irrelevancy and becoming a dinosaur. Stay in the learning process all your life. You’ll find that it isn’t crowded in that space. But it will bode well for both your career and your mental health.


It’s been an interesting ride – and continues to be interesting. I hope it stays interesting until the universe decides to take the parts back (and that it decides to make that REAL quick – no loitering in extended morbidity for me!).

Any of you “been there, done this?” I’d love to hear your stories. Share ’em with a comment below.

Open Letter to Madison, Who’s 39 and “Feeling old.” Oh, please!!

Photo by Julien L on Unsplash

Madison ??, from somewhere on this planet, tossed out this question recently on Quora.com. I couldn’t resist responding since I’ve passed her by 2x and just might have a few thoughts on the topic.


I’m sorry. You are not qualified to claim that moniker. You haven’t:

  • stubbed your toe enough,
  • screwed up enough,
  • experienced enough crises/calamities,
  • enjoyed enough victories.

Your “old” is just between your temples.

Old is a state of mind and 39 is just a number with no particular significance other than the one that you may be allowing our culture to load on you.

Against the average lifespan of 80 today, you haven’t reached halftime. But, that is thinking “average” which I suspect you aren’t since you are asking this type of question.


You are at an inflection point.

Our culture would say that you are expressing signs of the classic “mid-life crisis” which is largely a myth. What most people think is a mid-life crisis is more of life delivering you a check-up, a wake-up call.

That’s healthy. So let the questions come.

Ask bigger questions.

Think BIG.

Then go small!


You’re 39 and have forever to make big things happen and enjoy life while you are doing it.

But it has to start with knowing what it is you want.

What is your big life picture?

You’ve already stated you “have so much to accomplish.” What is it? How much clarity do you have about it? What’s it for? Who’s it for? What is the change you want to make? (You can thank Seth Godin for that guidance).

Find that and then go small and bring it back to today and do one thing that will move you closer to that big picture. Do that every day and you will be blown away by what can happen in your life in five years.


I’m not making this stuff up.

Gary Keller, the founder of Keller Williams Real Estate, wrote the classic book on this topic entitled – wait for it – “The One Thing.”

Now would be a good time for you to read it.


One last thing:

Think both/and, not either/or.

You want to accomplish a lot but also travel and enjoy life. Those don’t have to be mutually exclusive. You can do both.

One more last thing:

Get healthy, stay healthy. Become a student of your biology, of how your mind and body work, and give both what they need to operate optimally. Poor health dashes more big-picture dreams than anything else.


Thanks for the question. Go big. Go small. But GO!

What do you think about old people?

I like myself.

Since I’m 2 weeks short of 80, I am, by our distorted, number-fixated cultural standards, officially really old.

With the average lifespan for the American male currently at 78.79 (2019) and declining, I’m late for my funeral.

I’ve liked myself best through my late-60s and 70s.

On that score, I may be a bit of an outlier, from what I can observe.


I’m working to avoid being what most people don’t like about “really old people.” My mission is to avoid becoming the grumpy, immobile, stooped over, smelly ol’ fart I swore I’d never become.

(This is not a self-portrait!!!!!)


So far so good. Admittedly, some parts of the smelly thing are not totally in my control (see this popular article).

But, the rest? Those are choices I can make to break from the pack of what most people generally don’t like about old people.

I’m not stooped. I work out 6–7 days a week, aerobically and weight-lifting. I can hold my own with many 30 years my junior. My vertical is still good.

Grumpy? Well, occasionally, when I waste a day not living up to my potential and only with an incredibly tolerant wife of 51 years who mostly ignores or laughs it off and moves on.


I’m not inclined to spend most of my time hanging out with my age cohort. (See this article).

Assembling with my age cohort can be uncomfortable as too often the conversations become “organ recitals” talking about the aches, pains, past and pending surgeries, friends with developing dementia, the sad state of a world that refuses to go back to the norms of the 1950s, etc., etc.

It can get pretty boring and deflating. And a chirpy, opinionated iconoclast like myself can put a quick damper on a sagging dinner conversation since that space between the temples of most 70-year-olds can resemble concrete and isn’t all that malleable.

But, I chirp on hoping that maybe one thought about how to live a longer, healthier life might stick. I’ve resigned to the realization that I have no obligation to change anybody’s life – I’m only obligated to try.

And try, I do – but this cohort is a tough crowd!

So, I try to balance my hanging with my cohort with hanging with younger people – GenXers and Millennials. I’m anxious to learn from them and found, surprisingly, they are receptive to a touch of “geezer wisdom.”

We geezers-in-progress condemn/criticize these “youngsters” at our own peril.


Growing old is inevitable and unavoidable. Getting old is optional.

Bottom line is, how we get old is largely under our control. We choose how we “get” old through our attitudes and lifestyles.

We are all growing old and will die.

Or as Dr. Walter Bortz, retired Stanford geriatric physician and author once stated:

“Life is a fatal disease. Once contracted there is no known cure.”

We all have some control over the pace and total control over how we view it.


We all know 50 year-olds going on 80 and 80-year-olds going on 50. The difference is largely choices and mindset.

I love the latter and don’t do well with the former.

How about you?

Why Did Isocrates Live to 98 and We Can’t Make It Past 80? A Longevity Lesson from the Ancient Greeks.

Much has been said about the meteoric increase in average lifespan over the last century. I’ve made a pretty big deal of it all in past articles. Considering that we moved that needle from 47 years to about 80 between 1910 and 2010, I guess it’s worth a mention. Especially since we hockey-sticked it more in 100 years than in the last 100-200,000 years.

 


The emperor has clothes but they have worn pretty thin.

It makes for a great story, this hockey stick stat. That is until we pull back the curtain and find the glitter has left the gold.

Kudos are due to the medical establishment, government, and technology for teaming up to reverse the elements that resulted in a 47-year average life span. Together they:

  • Reversed infant mortality
  • Eliminated or radically reduced infectious diseases
  • Improved workplace safety
  • Improved our drinking water
  • Improved quality and availability of food
  • Improved education

A lot of “fixing.” A lot of “curing.” A lot of “downstream repair.”

All low-hanging fruit. 

Then we hit a wall around 2010 and started going backward.


Now we’re stuck – with institutions that can’t, or won’t, think like the Greeks!

The ancient Greeks probably would have cautioned us to think deeper during that 1910-2010 sprint.


Hygeia vs Panacea

The Greeks, 2,500 years ago, had it right in many areas, but particularly when it came to good health. They identified that medicine had two components – Hygeia and Panacea.

Hygeia equals health preservation and Panacea equals repair. Hygeia equals prevention. Panacea equals cure.

For the Greeks, Hygeia held precedence.

Our 100 years of fixing and repair never got us to that model. We’ve moved far from it with limited interest in moving in that direction.

And the consequences are glaring.

We are getting sicker as a population each day – and have been for the better part of 50 years. 


Hygeia and Eugeria

In his outstanding book “Boundless Potential: Transform Your Brain, Unleash Your Talents, Reinvent Your Work in Midlife and Beyond,” author Mark S. Walton reveals a number of things that we (and our medical establishment) can learn from the Greeks when it comes to our health and longevity.

Many of Greek fame lived longer than most. At a time when the normal lifespan was around 35, many of the notable, quotable Greeks lived longer and aged happily.

Walton points out that a study by the Royal Society of Medicine in London explored this in 1994 and 2007, studying the “men of intellectual excellence and achievement” during that period.  They found that the “men of fame” had a mean and median life span of 71.3 and 70 years, respectively. Twice the average!

It turns out that the Greeks had another arrow in their quiver of equal importance to hygeia – a term for attaining genuine happiness called eugeria.

According to Walton, eugeria required:

“-a lifelong pursuit of worthy goals through the three components of our humanity: body, mind, and soul.”

Walton examines the Greek eugeria formula and its components:

  1. They played hard. They were “the first people in the world to play and they played on a grand scale.” Games, athletic contests of every description. Not as an end in itself but as preparation “for the work yet to come.”
  2. They worked hard. As the world’s first knowledge workers, they never stopped exerting their minds and were the original reinventing people. Knowledge work was the ultimate fun.
  3. They paid it forward. For them, “-it was clear that the soulful pursuit of paying it forward, of working for the benefit of each other and future generations, provided the greatest payback of all.”

He reminds us that the word philanthropy was derived from two Greek roots: philo (love) and anthropos (mankind) and that:

“The lifelong pursuit of excellence (arete), with the goal of contributing our accomplishments to others – this, to the Greeks, was the ultimate formula, the blueprint, for eugeria, a long and happy life.”

Plato lived to 80; Isocrates to 98; Sophocles to 90; Aristarchus, Democritus, and Gorgias all lived past 100.

Today, you will be front-page media fodder for living 20% past the average life span i.e. to 100. In ancient Greece, living 2x the average or more wasn’t all that unusual.

Walton provides a nice summary:

While the Athenian paradigm has faded into history, the thinking behind it has endured through the ages – most especially its soulful tenet: that paying it forward, working for the sake of others, pays us back in unexpected ways.”


Our lifestyles, built around bad diet, sedentary living, seeking comfort and convenience, and an increasing lack of generativity would have been unsettling to the Greeks but it’s how we choose to live and thus pull up short of our full life potential.

We won’t get help from a healthcare system that grew up “fixing” and can’t/won’t move off a business model based on cure and a “downstream” mindset that avoids addressing the cause in favor of fixing the symptoms.

The Greeks believed in prevention. Our systems are geared to cure. The Greeks planned “upstream”; we react “downstream.”

The Greeks never stopped learning. We warehouse our brains at a certain age.

And-

-the Greeks had no inkling of the concept of retirement.

I suspect they would have found the concept foolish, maybe even offensive.


We’ve got a lot to learn. The Greeks can still teach us.

The question is: Are we willing to be taught?


What do you think about this? Leave us your thoughts with a comment below. We appreciate your feedback.

How does one work a 40 hour a week job, have time to cook healthy meals, sleep 8 hours a night, and go to the gym?

 

Maybe you’ve got this all figured out.

I don’t.

I know – we’re just supposed to get better at “time management.”

But then, we can’t “manage time.” Time is fixed, immutable, and unchanging. It manages itself and we can’t change what exists for us to function within. We can’t change that a minute is a minute and a day is a day.

We can only manage ourselves.

What we tag as “poor time management” is simply “poor self-management.”


I can sense your pain because you are baffled – as we all are – by “where does all my time go? How can I end up killing so much time?”

I’m a pretty organized guy that doesn’t finish a day without saying to myself: “Where the hell did my day go and why didn’t I get done what I wanted to get done?”

Have you tried doing the math on your day or week? I do it all the time trying to get better at not “killing” so much time.

Eight decades and I’m still frustrated with my progress!!


Let’s do a hypothetical and try to break down the question.  I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt on some of this.

  • 168 hours (the week we all start with)
  • Less 40 hours of work
  • Less 5 hours commute (five days, 30 minutes one way)
  • Less 56 hours of sleep
  • Less 14 hours to fix and eat healthy meals
  • Less 8 hours at the gym
  • Balance: 40 hours

24% of the week untagged.

Isn’t it freaky how we can’t account for a quarter of our week? Or that it slips through our fingers so easily?


The gold for a fulfilling, happy, purposeful life lies in our 24%.

People who demonstrate productive self-management seem to have a handful of common sense things they have put in place:

  1. A well-defined direction and sense of purpose in their lives. They have clear, challenging, and motivating goals, know where they are going, and have a limited number of lanes they are staying in.
  2. They stay focused on priorities by defining what is most important within those lanes. They have learned to avoid letting the urgent displace the important. (You might find Stephen Covey’s classic book “The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People” helpful).
  3. They are very good at saying “no.” This appears to be one of the most important things to consider to put solid self-management in place. Self-management experts will tell you that saying “yes” is a major killer of getting your time use under control. Whether you say “yes” or “no” will be driven by the clarity of, and commitment to, your goals and purpose.
  4. They have 5 or 10-year plans that are written but flexible. They work backward from those to develop written quarterly, monthly, weekly, and daily activity lists.

You can see that the principles of good “self-management” aren’t rocket science. But that’s not to say they are easy. Life just gets in the way. Being able to roll with the unexpected that sucks up so much of that 24% and getting back on track takes discipline. And, without question, discipline is central to good self-management.


Two books to consider.

When I feel myself skidding off the rails on my efficiency, I’ll drag out one of two books that are reminders that this doesn’t need to be the problem that I allow it to become.


Time is our most valuable resource. Once spent it is irretrievable. Treat it with respect and it will reward you in kind.

What works best for you to get your time under control? Love to hear your thoughts. Leave a comment or drop me an email at gary@makeagingwork.com

Is Early Retirement As Good As They Say, Or Is It Like The Grass Is Always Greener On The Other Side? The Jury May Still Be Out.

I will say, however, I feel that the idea of early retirement is further validation of the tremendous grip this unnatural concept has on our psyche.

I find it curious and revealing that, in the U.S. where I live, you are considered deficient, unfortunate, or weird if you don’t retire and disengage from work on or around an arbitrary number established 86 years ago – age 65.

Conversely, you are considered heroic and put on a pedestal for being able to retire and disengage ahead of that number.

In some ways, it’s a sad commentary on what work has become for so many – a non-fulfilling, uninspiring slog through long commutes, bad bosses, unpredictability, and lack of control.

Do we need any more validation of that than the current “Great Resignation” phenomenon?


Early retirement may have a dark side.

  • Shell Oil studied thousands of its employees and found that retiring at 55 doubled the risk for death before reaching 65 compared to those who worked beyond age 65, challenging the notion that retiring early boosts longevity and, in fact, demonstrating the opposite – mortality rates improve with later retirement.
  • A study in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health suggests that retiring early may actually increase your risk of dying early. Findings showed that healthy people who postponed retirement and chose to retire a year later than those in the comparison group had an 11% lower risk of dying early.
  • A study from Cornell U. and the University of Melbourne shows a striking correlation between social security claims for early takers and a jump in mortality. Men in particular see an increase in mortality risk of about 20%.
  • According to the International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, retiring later appears to delay the onset of Alzheimer’s.

Flunk retirement? No way!

In my experience as a career transition and retirement coach, it is rare that any retiree – early or not, and particularly, men –  will admit that their retirement isn’t going well. And many retirements don’t go well because the advance planning only had to do with the money.

Over one-half of retirees enter their retirement with no semblance of a non-financial plan that would include discussion and a plan for the psychological, mental, physical, and spiritual sides of retirement.

Early retirees are guilty as well. One thing they may fail to factor in is the role of relationships in retirement and not consider that their circle of relationships will shrink and be difficult to restore because few people their age are retired.

One risk for any retiree is the threat of boredom. Far too many retirees retire from something and not to something. Self-indulgent, leisure-based retirement quickly wears thin for most, and without a purpose or a sustainable, inspiring reason to get up in the morning, boredom is in the wings. Boredom often leads to depression.


In summary –

– retirement fails to acknowledge the important role that work plays in longevity. We are built to work, to create, to produce. Retirement goes against that, and other, critical components of our biology which offers us only two options. We either grow or we stagnate.

The traditional self-indulgent, leisure-based retirement model just simply isn’t healthy in the long term as evidenced by the fact that, in the U.S., our elderly spend more of their years in chronic illness than any other developed nation.

We tend to “live too short and die too long.”

We can’t push all of that off on retirement, but we need to be honest and acknowledge that it does play a role.

I see no reason to start that deterioration process early – or ever.

How about you?

Why Do the Japanese Outlive Us in America – Without a 24 Hour Fitness?

Photo by Ash Edmonds on Unsplash

Remember when GM, Ford, Chrysler scoffed at the quality of Japanese “rice burners” that started showing up on the U.S. market back in the 1970s and dismissed their presence as a potential threat.

Not long thereafter, the American auto industry started rolling out gems like this rolling bathtub –

– while Toyota and Honda began eating their lunch with Accords and Lexus’s?

We’ve been slow to learn in lots of areas, refusing to budge from our “greatest country on earth” arrogance.


This may be another one. Did you know that –

– fewer than 3% of Japanese go to a fitness club.

– life expectancy in Japan is 84.9 years (#2 globally behind Hong Kong), 6 years longer than the 78.9 for the U.S. (which places us 39th globally, between Curacao and Poland).

Japanese experience fewer deaths from ischemic heart disease and cancer (especially breast and prostate cancer).

-the obesity rate in Japan is about 5% for men and less than 4% for women, compared to an obesity prevalence of over 42% in the United States.

It’s not that the Japanese don’t exercise. They just do it much differently and, it seems, without the need for mirror muscles and “personal bests” in anything.

When researchers asked Japanese young people in their 20s about regular exercise, they got these responses:

  • walking (42 percent)
  • stretching (24 percent)
  • jogging (22 percent)

No mention of dumbbells, kettlebells, Peloton, or BowFlex.

Approximately half of those queried offered that they barely exercised, about once a month or not at all. Exercises with names like rajio taiso, dai-ichi, dai-ni, dai-san are common and usually start with children.

So far, I haven’t heard any of those exercises offered up at my 24 Hour Fitness.


You don’t suppose that diet plays a role in this longevity?

Duh!

There are a handful of diets associated with good health and the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Those include the Mediterranean diet, the DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension), the vegetarian diet, and – VOILA! – the Japanese diet.

 


This chart contrasts the Japanese diet versus other developed countries and provides some of the “why” to this greater longevity (I’ve circled those components that stand out versus the Standard American Diet).

It’s no secret we like our meat, starch, and sugars. And we’re not inclined to give them up or moderate them even when nearly half of us in the U.S. have fatty liver disease and are overweight or obese.


It’s complicated –

-this whole diet thing.

I chirped a couple of weeks ago about the content of the book “Metabolical” by Dr. Robert Lustig. It’s a complex read and has drawn out considerable ire from several communities, including his own medical profession and from nutrition professionals.

I’ve watched a handful of podcast interviews of Dr. Lustig and find him very focused and consistent on his message. A one-sentence summary of his position is:

Protect the liver, feed the gut. Stop eating processed foods, increase the fiber, and eliminate the sugar.

With Dr. Lustig, calories don’t count. It’s what’s been done to the food that we eat that counts. Calories are independent of the content that is producing the insulin resistance that is leading to fatty liver disease and obesity. You can imagine how well that goes down in a medical and nutrition/diet community that has been preaching “calories in, calories out” for almost a half-century.

If you’ve plodded through the book, you’ll have discovered that he doesn’t advocate for any type of diet – vegan or ketogenic. He’s good with either one – or a combination. It’s all about the adulteration of the food, the lack of fiber, and the sugar. I’m sure he would endorse the Japanese diet with its reduced sugar and starch.


We all have a vote.

He’s predicting that “food will be the next tobacco” but that it will take 20-30 years to turn this ship away from unhealthy food. I found it interesting that he says on one podcast that our starting points that will get this change started are (1) eliminating food subsidies and (2) reaching the children.

In the book, he makes his point:

“Right now, the only things standing between us and success are: sugar addicts in the population, hubris addicts in the medical and ancillary professions, money addicts in the food and pharma industries, and power addicts in Washington and beyond. But things can change when the culture changes.

How do you change an entire culture? In the last forty years, we’ve witnessed four separate cultural tectonic shifts in America: 1) smoking in public places; 2) drunk driving; 3) bicycle helmets and seat belts, and 4) condoms in bathrooms. In 1980, if any elected official stood up in a State House or in Congress or in Parliament and proposed legislation to combat any of these, he or she would have been laughed right out of office. Today, they’re all facts of life. 

We also taught the children who grew up and started voting. And the naysayers, well, they’re all dead. That’s why culture shifts are generational shifts. You’re seeing it now with climate change. We need a global reckoning around food. It’s already started, but it has to pick up more steam. 

What can you do today? You have the vote – instead of the a ballot box, you have your fork. Your vote is tallied immediately. And you get to vote twenty-one times a week – every meal, three times, every day. 

Vote early. Vote often.”


I’m feeling less guilty.

I followed “Metabolical” with another book recommendation and found myself entangled in equally complex and oft-confusing explanations of what goes on in all of us metabolically. This book doesn’t come from a clinician but from a highly regarded scientific journalist by the name of Gary Taubes in a book entitled “Why We Get Fat and What To Do About It.”

Backed by amazing historical research revealing the bad nutritional science of the last century and an amazing grasp of our metabolical functions, Taubes builds a case somewhat similar to Dr. Lustig’s with regard to the elimination of processed food and sugar but comes down more in support of the importance of fat in our diet.

It’s complicated and technical too, but I found it compelling enough to stop beating myself up for those occasional times when we sneak some beef into a stew or include a chicken breast as a part of a meal.


What’s a person to do?

First it’s this, and then it’s that. Then it’s don’t do this or be sure to do that. It’s like dancing on peanut butter, this whole diet and metabolism thing.

I certainly am not qualified to offer up any dietary advice. I will just say that, after these readings, I’m buying into both authors positions and aiming to:

Protect my liver, feed my gut by reducing processed foods, increasing the fiber, radically reducing the sugar, and being sure to consume appropriate amounts of healthy fat. 

No vegan. No keto. Somewhere in between.

Maybe – more Japanese like!

Except, I’m not giving up my trips to 24 Hour Fitness.

 


 

Asking Your Forgiveness – I’ve Been Helping You Die Early.

Alexas_Fotos on Pixabay

I was mad last week.

I was only 1/3 through Dr. Robert Lustig’s book, “Metabolical”, at the time.

Now I’m 7/8 through.

I’m madder – with a permanent state of mad.

I’ve also discovered I owe you, dear reader, an apology.

I’ve misled you with some of my writing.


If you’ve tracked with me for a while, you’ve been subjected to a number of articles like this: What is the biggest failure in modern health? Maybe not what you think?  

I’ve been pretty liberal in my use of some pretty ugly photos to draw emphasis to obesity. Like:

Well, the message with those pictures and my articles has been mostly wrong. The message has always inferred lack of personal responsibility and that obesity leads to sickness.

You can scratch that understanding if you bought into it.


Here’s the real truth, ala Dr. Lustig:

Obesity itself doesn’t make us sick. It’s what we eat that makes us sick, then we get obese, and from there we experience a cascading of diseases i.e. cancer, Type 2 diabetes, dementia, heart disease.

In Lustig’s words:

“The key to the kingdom is that it is not about obesity, it is about metabolic dysfunction and anyone can get it, and that’s what makes it a public health crisis, because obesity is a result of the problem, not the cause.

I never want to hear any of you talk about the obesity epidemic ever again, because that is the food industry’s mantra, that is what they use to obfuscate the truth, and you play right into it when you talk about it.”

I consider myself duly reprimanded. For having done that, I apologize.

I was thinking downstream when the problem is upstream.


Tobacco debacle Part Deux

Remember how big tobacco denied for years that smoking caused cancer and that nicotine wasn’t addictive although they knew otherwise. And how it took massive effort on the part of the government to unpack those lies and hold them accountable.

Even when cornered, big tobacco shifted the blame with a party line that said “nobody forces anybody to smoke. It’s a personal choice.”

Big food has borrowed the playbook.

The Centers for Health Statistics revealed that 42% of U.S. adults were obese in 2018.

Obesity was rare 40 years ago, as was Type 2 diabetes.

Our metabolic processes didn’t change in 40 years. But what we do to them has – dramatically!

It’s undeniable that it’s all about the twin evils of sugar and processed foods – and especially the sugar in processed food.

Big Food knows this and that they are killing us slowly. The facts are undeniable, the evidence overwhelming. Big Food’s scourge is equivalent to  – perhaps worse than – Big Tobacco’s scourge. The party line is the same:

“It’s your fault – nobody forces you to visit Carl’s Junior. We just make what people want.”


It’s complicated.

The metabolical processes, that is.

Not the solutions.

Dr. Lusting goes into mind-boggling detail in “Metabolical” to explain the chemical processes that go on in our bodies and how they are affected by what we eat. More detail than we need and lots of hard-to-connect dots. But he brings it all together into a six-word solution for avoiding the metabolic dysfunctions that lead to obesity and other chronic conditions.

Protect the liver, feed the gut.

Tell me – how much were you taught or have you learned about the connection between the liver and what goes on in your gut (stomach and intestines)?

OK – I’ll settle for nothing. That’s where I was pre-Lustig.

Tell me – how many conversations have you had with your PCP about the connection between the liver and what goes on in your gut?

OK- zero, I get it. They never had a Lustig in medical school and aren’t motivated to take the time to learn what he knows.

“That’s upstream stuff. I’m a downstream specialist” says your PCP.

Can you imagine your PCP saying to you that your high blood pressure, or high LDL, or A1C is “foodable” rather than “druggable?”

Ain’t gonna happen.

You then begin to realize that-

-so much of this is not our fault.


We are living lab rats.

Julia Hubbell writes daily on Medium.com. She’s on this soapbox too and recently put this twist on the issue:

“You and I are living lab rats. Like it or not the world is full of people who are being fed poisonous toxins packaged as fun foods for the kids and adults alike. Every single one of us, when we choose chips over apples, sweetened cereals over plain oatmeal, Coca Cola over plain water is choosing death over life. We are poisoning our cells day by day, ingesting disease-inducing substances put into seductive packaging.”

“And all the while, we blame fat people for getting fat because they are lazy, not because specialized food scientists are paid massive sums to get us addicted, keep us addicted and utterly unable to say no to their products. We are being manipulated by Big Food to hate people for getting sick as a result of eating foods that ads convince us are harmless, even as we do terrible harm to ourselves by eating them.”

Until we get “upstream” from the problem by understanding how we inflict ourselves with metabolic dysfunction and then vote with our food purchase dollars, this destruction will continue unabated.

It’s not about the calories. It’s not about the obesity.

It’s all about the processed food – and the money that spins off of its consumption.

Dr. Lustig let’s us know just how big that is:

“The entire food industry (grocery and restaurant) grosses $1.46 trillion per year with a profit of $657 billion. Yet U.S. medical costs total $3.5 trillion per year, of which 75 percent are food-related chronic disease. Conversely, the pharma industry generates $771 billion in gross revenue annually, of which 21 percent is gross profit. One company made $19 billion in annual profit from diabetes drugs alone.

You do the math: between food and pharma, you’ve got $2.1 trillion per year going down a rathole – into shareholder pockets – while the public gets sicker and healthcare is collapsing. We lose triple what the food industry makes cleaning up their mess. 

This is unsustainable. “


Let’s all get mad.

A REAL FOOD diet is more available and less expensive than we realize. We need to get “upstream” and stop being lab rats.

We’ll take a look at REAL FOOD in subsequent posts.


Chime in here. Are you able to sustain a real food diet? What is it? How do you do it? Share your thoughts. We’re all in this together.